The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 05:17, 29 December 2008 [1].
I am nominating Festivus for featured article, specifically for December 23rd of this year. That's this coming Tuesday. Now, I know it was nominated in the past, and it was refused, but from what it says on the previous nomination thing, I've gathered that the article wasn't nearly as good back then as it was now. It's really lengthy now, in-depth, and what, 28 references? Great intro paragraph, references out the wazoo, in-depth, detailed, and lengthy sections, definitely good stuff. I'd say it would be practically a crime to not give this article a second chance at featured article candidacy, as it seems to have vastly improved since its first nomination. Also fitting, considering the time of year, you know? Huh ( talk) 00:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose. Sorry, but this has a few major issues:
These few points I spotted with only a cursory glance through the text, and I did not evaluate the sources or grammar. This article is a long way off featured quality. Aptery gial 09:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Comments to the oppose guy above:
The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 05:17, 29 December 2008 [1].
I am nominating Festivus for featured article, specifically for December 23rd of this year. That's this coming Tuesday. Now, I know it was nominated in the past, and it was refused, but from what it says on the previous nomination thing, I've gathered that the article wasn't nearly as good back then as it was now. It's really lengthy now, in-depth, and what, 28 references? Great intro paragraph, references out the wazoo, in-depth, detailed, and lengthy sections, definitely good stuff. I'd say it would be practically a crime to not give this article a second chance at featured article candidacy, as it seems to have vastly improved since its first nomination. Also fitting, considering the time of year, you know? Huh ( talk) 00:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose. Sorry, but this has a few major issues:
These few points I spotted with only a cursory glance through the text, and I did not evaluate the sources or grammar. This article is a long way off featured quality. Aptery gial 09:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Comments to the oppose guy above: