The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 15:29, 27 June 2011 [1].
False potto ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Did you know that the false potto may be a true potto? This African primate was described in 1996 with some fanfare, but people can't agree on whether it is in fact distinct from the potto or not. Things are complicated by the fact that there is probably more than one species of true potto. I have covered all sources I could find on it, and the article was improved by a GA review by Visionholder. Ucucha 07:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Sources comment: No citations to Stump (2004) that I can see. Otherwise the references and citations look fine, though no spotchecking done. Brianboulton ( talk) 09:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Image is unproblematic, caption looks fine. Nikkimaria ( talk) 16:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Sasata comments
TCO image concerns.
Support: I provided the GAN review of this article and covered it thoroughly at that time. I am still content with this article and see no obvious issues. – VisionHolder « talk » 03:01, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 15:29, 27 June 2011 [1].
False potto ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Did you know that the false potto may be a true potto? This African primate was described in 1996 with some fanfare, but people can't agree on whether it is in fact distinct from the potto or not. Things are complicated by the fact that there is probably more than one species of true potto. I have covered all sources I could find on it, and the article was improved by a GA review by Visionholder. Ucucha 07:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Sources comment: No citations to Stump (2004) that I can see. Otherwise the references and citations look fine, though no spotchecking done. Brianboulton ( talk) 09:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Image is unproblematic, caption looks fine. Nikkimaria ( talk) 16:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Sasata comments
TCO image concerns.
Support: I provided the GAN review of this article and covered it thoroughly at that time. I am still content with this article and see no obvious issues. – VisionHolder « talk » 03:01, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply