The article was promoted by GrahamColm 17:19, 11 September 2012 [1].
Ex parte Crow Dog ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I believe that it meets all of the FA criteria. It is currently a GA and just had a peer-review. Please note that this article uses WP:MOSLAW and per that styleguide to use local citation guides, references are in the Bluebook format. GregJackP Boomer! 16:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Comments by Cryptic C62:
More to come. -- Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Support with comments after peer review. It's an excellent article. It's well-written and accessible, a rarity among law articles. Just a couple things I noticed on further reading:
-- Batard0 ( talk) 11:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Images - File:Thomas_Stanley_Matthews_-_Brady-Handy.jpg needs US PD tag.
Nikkimaria (
talk)
00:51, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
Support, with proviso that I've not looked at the images. I reviewed this at GA back in 2010. I had a doubt about one of the images then, but wasn't able to reach a conclusion. Hopefully that won't hold up someone more experienced with image review than I :-). My only other query is whether the very last sentence "Congress has subsequently used this power to breach the Medicine Lodge Treaty with the Kiowa by reducing the size of the Kiowa reservation without their consent" is a bit off topic, as neither that treaty nor that tribe have been mentioned previously in the article. But it is a minor quibble in a fascinating article. hamiltonstone ( talk) 11:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Delegate's note - Spotchecks for verification and close-paraphrasing are needed. Graham Colm ( talk) 12:42, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Spotchecks
The article was promoted by GrahamColm 17:19, 11 September 2012 [1].
Ex parte Crow Dog ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I believe that it meets all of the FA criteria. It is currently a GA and just had a peer-review. Please note that this article uses WP:MOSLAW and per that styleguide to use local citation guides, references are in the Bluebook format. GregJackP Boomer! 16:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Comments by Cryptic C62:
More to come. -- Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Support with comments after peer review. It's an excellent article. It's well-written and accessible, a rarity among law articles. Just a couple things I noticed on further reading:
-- Batard0 ( talk) 11:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Images - File:Thomas_Stanley_Matthews_-_Brady-Handy.jpg needs US PD tag.
Nikkimaria (
talk)
00:51, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
Support, with proviso that I've not looked at the images. I reviewed this at GA back in 2010. I had a doubt about one of the images then, but wasn't able to reach a conclusion. Hopefully that won't hold up someone more experienced with image review than I :-). My only other query is whether the very last sentence "Congress has subsequently used this power to breach the Medicine Lodge Treaty with the Kiowa by reducing the size of the Kiowa reservation without their consent" is a bit off topic, as neither that treaty nor that tribe have been mentioned previously in the article. But it is a minor quibble in a fascinating article. hamiltonstone ( talk) 11:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Delegate's note - Spotchecks for verification and close-paraphrasing are needed. Graham Colm ( talk) 12:42, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
Spotchecks