The article was promoted by Ealdgyth via FACBot ( talk) 23 September 2020 [1].
This article is about a young watercolorist and etcher from Norfolk, Edward Daniell, whose career as an amateur artist was cut short when he succumbed to malaria in Turkey in 1842. The article was a FAC In July 2020, but failed to be promoted. It was then peer reviewed in August. I'm hoping that the article is now nearer the point where it can be promoted to FA. Amitchell125 ( talk) 15:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Per previous FAC ( t · c) buidhe 06:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Support. I supported at the previous FAC, and it has noticeably improved since then. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Support. I also supported the first nomination, and don't see a reason to change my stance. Kaiser matias ( talk) 05:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Support per my read through and comments at PR. The article was in decent shape at the previous FAC and the PR led to some immense prose improvements, fulfilling the only FAC criteria it may have been lacking. Aza24 ( talk) 04:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Support, I engaged at the peer review, and am satisfied! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 14:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Support - This looks great. I read this article in the previous FAC, which I was happy with, but it now appears significant improvements have been made to the prose. Let's give the star it rightly deserves! L150 17:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Support - Having participated in both the first FAC and subsequent PR. This can be held up as one of our best. Ceoil ( talk) 02:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
I may end up claiming points towards the wikicup. Hope you don't mind! :P|
I'll take a look at this article, and give some comments on how it meets the FA criteria in a little while. If you fancy doing some QPQ, I have a list of items that can be looked at here - specifically FACs for 2020 World Snooker Championship and 1984 World Snooker Championship Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 16:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
:To note this comment is neither actionable or likely to be.
Ceoil (
talk)
12:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Source review? -- Ealdgyth ( talk) 15:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Beginning spot checks based on this version of the article
Overall, these spot checks indicate that sources back claims, and there is no close paraphrasing or copy-vio. Ceoil ( talk) 07:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Source spot checks seem good, promoting. -- Ealdgyth ( talk) 14:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The article was promoted by Ealdgyth via FACBot ( talk) 23 September 2020 [1].
This article is about a young watercolorist and etcher from Norfolk, Edward Daniell, whose career as an amateur artist was cut short when he succumbed to malaria in Turkey in 1842. The article was a FAC In July 2020, but failed to be promoted. It was then peer reviewed in August. I'm hoping that the article is now nearer the point where it can be promoted to FA. Amitchell125 ( talk) 15:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Per previous FAC ( t · c) buidhe 06:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Support. I supported at the previous FAC, and it has noticeably improved since then. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 10:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Support. I also supported the first nomination, and don't see a reason to change my stance. Kaiser matias ( talk) 05:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Support per my read through and comments at PR. The article was in decent shape at the previous FAC and the PR led to some immense prose improvements, fulfilling the only FAC criteria it may have been lacking. Aza24 ( talk) 04:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Support, I engaged at the peer review, and am satisfied! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 14:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Support - This looks great. I read this article in the previous FAC, which I was happy with, but it now appears significant improvements have been made to the prose. Let's give the star it rightly deserves! L150 17:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Support - Having participated in both the first FAC and subsequent PR. This can be held up as one of our best. Ceoil ( talk) 02:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
I may end up claiming points towards the wikicup. Hope you don't mind! :P|
I'll take a look at this article, and give some comments on how it meets the FA criteria in a little while. If you fancy doing some QPQ, I have a list of items that can be looked at here - specifically FACs for 2020 World Snooker Championship and 1984 World Snooker Championship Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 16:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
:To note this comment is neither actionable or likely to be.
Ceoil (
talk)
12:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Source review? -- Ealdgyth ( talk) 15:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Beginning spot checks based on this version of the article
Overall, these spot checks indicate that sources back claims, and there is no close paraphrasing or copy-vio. Ceoil ( talk) 07:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Source spot checks seem good, promoting. -- Ealdgyth ( talk) 14:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)