The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 22:14, 1 November 2008 [1].
I am nominating Economy of Ohio for featured article status because I believe it meets the requirements to do so. Significant improvements have been made to the article since its last FAC, and Economy of Ohio is now a "Good Article." The sources are varied, and there is a reliable, governmental source that is constant throughout the article. The article is not overly verbose, while at the same time gets the point across. Comments? Jd027 talk 22:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply
– Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I'll provide some more later. Cheers, – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 22:14, 1 November 2008 [1].
I am nominating Economy of Ohio for featured article status because I believe it meets the requirements to do so. Significant improvements have been made to the article since its last FAC, and Economy of Ohio is now a "Good Article." The sources are varied, and there is a reliable, governmental source that is constant throughout the article. The article is not overly verbose, while at the same time gets the point across. Comments? Jd027 talk 22:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply
– Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I'll provide some more later. Cheers, – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC) reply