The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 02:42, 16 October 2008 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because I feel that it meets the FA criteria. It is already at GA and is stable.
Dalejenkins |
19:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Oppose for the moment. The article is interesting and informative, but it is not at present set up like a featured article.
Dumped, which was filmed in June 2006, was initially scheduled for Channel 4's Spring 2007 line-up. [1] [2] However, this did not occur and the programme was then postponed until the start the channel's period of "creative renewal", which was established due to the racism controversy that occurred during the 2007 series of Celebrity Big Brother. [3]
Apart from its dubious construction and a missing word, I reckon that anyone unfamiliar with recent British reality TV history wouldn't understand what this paragraph was about. I suggest at the very least you delete the unnecessary words "this did not occur", and attempt a brief explanation of "creative renewal" (which doesn't need to be italicised).
The article does not appear to have had a peer review. I would strongly recommend this before it is returned to FAC. Brianboulton ( talk) 11:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Note No response after 10 days does not suggest much commitment on the part of the nominator - who has been contacted. Should this still be here? Brianboulton ( talk) 14:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC) reply
indi
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 02:42, 16 October 2008 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because I feel that it meets the FA criteria. It is already at GA and is stable.
Dalejenkins |
19:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Oppose for the moment. The article is interesting and informative, but it is not at present set up like a featured article.
Dumped, which was filmed in June 2006, was initially scheduled for Channel 4's Spring 2007 line-up. [1] [2] However, this did not occur and the programme was then postponed until the start the channel's period of "creative renewal", which was established due to the racism controversy that occurred during the 2007 series of Celebrity Big Brother. [3]
Apart from its dubious construction and a missing word, I reckon that anyone unfamiliar with recent British reality TV history wouldn't understand what this paragraph was about. I suggest at the very least you delete the unnecessary words "this did not occur", and attempt a brief explanation of "creative renewal" (which doesn't need to be italicised).
The article does not appear to have had a peer review. I would strongly recommend this before it is returned to FAC. Brianboulton ( talk) 11:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Note No response after 10 days does not suggest much commitment on the part of the nominator - who has been contacted. Should this still be here? Brianboulton ( talk) 14:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC) reply
indi
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).