The article has been
a good article candidate that failed, with concerns that appear not to have been addressed. The article
fails 1c (verifiability, no enough references) and 3 (
Image:Dragonballz.jpg does not have a fair use rationale). --
ReyBrujo 04:56, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Object, external links are not references.
YoBub 05:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Refer to Peer Review First! Not only no references, but also stubby sections and subsections.
UberCryxic 05:38, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong object Setting aside the lack of references, there's no discussion of plot, character, development or reception. Too much information (and uncited speculation) about distribution.--
Monocrat 06:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong object. No way is this a FA quality article. In addition to the comments above, almost 3/4 of the article is extremely list & table heavy... Please write (mostly) in prose. Also, the
lead needs some serious work.
Mikker(...) 09:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong Object - Yes, you don't have any references. No in line citations. Horrible, ugly cast table. Lots of bulleted lists. Not to be mean, but I wouldn't pass this for GA. Please send this to peer review. --
PresN 21:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Object as per Mikkerpikker.
Merosonox 07:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Object: Needs at least a plot summary and information about characters not just a cast list and saying that it is a continuation of Dragonball and they save Earth and other planets. OrfenUser Talk 02:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC)reply
The article has been
a good article candidate that failed, with concerns that appear not to have been addressed. The article
fails 1c (verifiability, no enough references) and 3 (
Image:Dragonballz.jpg does not have a fair use rationale). --
ReyBrujo 04:56, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Object, external links are not references.
YoBub 05:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Refer to Peer Review First! Not only no references, but also stubby sections and subsections.
UberCryxic 05:38, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong object Setting aside the lack of references, there's no discussion of plot, character, development or reception. Too much information (and uncited speculation) about distribution.--
Monocrat 06:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong object. No way is this a FA quality article. In addition to the comments above, almost 3/4 of the article is extremely list & table heavy... Please write (mostly) in prose. Also, the
lead needs some serious work.
Mikker(...) 09:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong Object - Yes, you don't have any references. No in line citations. Horrible, ugly cast table. Lots of bulleted lists. Not to be mean, but I wouldn't pass this for GA. Please send this to peer review. --
PresN 21:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Object as per Mikkerpikker.
Merosonox 07:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Object: Needs at least a plot summary and information about characters not just a cast list and saying that it is a continuation of Dragonball and they save Earth and other planets. OrfenUser Talk 02:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC)reply