The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 04:27, 7 March 2009 [1].
Article about Don Bradamn's role in the 1948 Invincibles team as its captain and No 1 player. Part of {{ The Invincibles squad}} FT drive. YellowMonkey ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 03:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Ref format comment -- Issue found with WP:REFTOOLS.
Comment - Ref 5 is for "pp 222–;225". The semi-colon may be another little glitch that can be fixed.
Giants2008 (
17-14)
21:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
reply
Comments - Here are a couple of quick things I saw while looking at the early part of the article again. My impressions of it as a whole are unchanged: great content, but lots of hard-to-understand cricket jargon.
Support with some comments by Peripitus. Lots of cricket jargon but I cannot see how this can be reduced without adding excessive explanatory text. To me at least—a cricket ignoramus—though the jargon slows reading, the article is well comprehensible.
- Peripitus (Talk) 06:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs) Pretty good.
The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 04:27, 7 March 2009 [1].
Article about Don Bradamn's role in the 1948 Invincibles team as its captain and No 1 player. Part of {{ The Invincibles squad}} FT drive. YellowMonkey ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 03:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Ref format comment -- Issue found with WP:REFTOOLS.
Comment - Ref 5 is for "pp 222–;225". The semi-colon may be another little glitch that can be fixed.
Giants2008 (
17-14)
21:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
reply
Comments - Here are a couple of quick things I saw while looking at the early part of the article again. My impressions of it as a whole are unchanged: great content, but lots of hard-to-understand cricket jargon.
Support with some comments by Peripitus. Lots of cricket jargon but I cannot see how this can be reduced without adding excessive explanatory text. To me at least—a cricket ignoramus—though the jargon slows reading, the article is well comprehensible.
- Peripitus (Talk) 06:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs) Pretty good.