This is an well-referenced and detailed article on a famous Australian politician. It has already undergone a
peer review, and improved further as a result. This is to hopefully be my fourth featured article - I welcome your comments and votes!
michaeltalk01:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Support, looks like a great article. Only slight problem is red links, especially in the first paragraph of "The Dunstan Decade". Not enough to vote oppose, but definitely unsightly.
Stilgar13505:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Conditional Support - I'm one of those sticklers for
WP:LEAD, in that this article should have at least a three paragraph lead section. Other than that, looks good to me!
Fieari18:28, 18 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment Not a criteria but is it possible fill out an infobox for Dunstan? I feel infoboxes add a higher level of quality and visual satisfaction to an article.
- Tutmosis14:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Conditional support. I should disclose, as required by the new rules, that I copy-edited part of the article a while back, and had another go at it an hour ago. I think it's good, but a few sentences need ironing out. See my inline queries. BTW, flesh-pink hot pants and cooking books, I love it! PS The WP:LEAD guidelines that Fieri cites above contain proposed guidelines, not strict rules, about the number of paragraphs in a lead. I'll certainly be opposing any move to strict rules in this respect.
Tony 08:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC) PPS Please consider consistent use of "ALP"/"Labor Party" after first spelling it out. Same for "SA"/"South Australia". "Commonwealth" is a difficult word for non-Australians. Consider using just "federal", which is universally understood.
Tony08:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)reply
This is an well-referenced and detailed article on a famous Australian politician. It has already undergone a
peer review, and improved further as a result. This is to hopefully be my fourth featured article - I welcome your comments and votes!
michaeltalk01:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Support, looks like a great article. Only slight problem is red links, especially in the first paragraph of "The Dunstan Decade". Not enough to vote oppose, but definitely unsightly.
Stilgar13505:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Conditional Support - I'm one of those sticklers for
WP:LEAD, in that this article should have at least a three paragraph lead section. Other than that, looks good to me!
Fieari18:28, 18 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment Not a criteria but is it possible fill out an infobox for Dunstan? I feel infoboxes add a higher level of quality and visual satisfaction to an article.
- Tutmosis14:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Conditional support. I should disclose, as required by the new rules, that I copy-edited part of the article a while back, and had another go at it an hour ago. I think it's good, but a few sentences need ironing out. See my inline queries. BTW, flesh-pink hot pants and cooking books, I love it! PS The WP:LEAD guidelines that Fieri cites above contain proposed guidelines, not strict rules, about the number of paragraphs in a lead. I'll certainly be opposing any move to strict rules in this respect.
Tony 08:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC) PPS Please consider consistent use of "ALP"/"Labor Party" after first spelling it out. Same for "SA"/"South Australia". "Commonwealth" is a difficult word for non-Australians. Consider using just "federal", which is universally understood.
Tony08:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)reply