The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 22:28, 2 September 2008 [1].
Disintegration is a 1989 album by
The Cure. After some delayed promises in May and June to work on the article that was pushed back to July, it is finally complete. It was promoted to Good Article status prior to the addition of the final section. Several editors have given it a copyedit. All questions, comments, (and) or concerns will be dealt with in a prompt and timely fashion.
NSR77
T
C
18:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
These issues should be relatively easy to fix. Awadewit ( talk) 23:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC) reply
comment
Image:RobertSmith89.JPG doesnt seem to significantly increase the readers' understanding (
WP:NFCC#8) and therefore its usage may breach FAC #3
Fasach Nua (
talk)
12:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments - sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:55, 25 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Prose spot-checks reveal problems:
Now, I find much of this article well written. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't be scrutinised carefully by a good copy-editor (like Deckiller); we want to be proud of this on the Internet. Tony (talk) 12:04, 26 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Question Is there a reason this article's title does not use parentheses? I strongly believe that the disambig page should be moved to this title while, this FAC article be moved to something with parenthesis. Nergaal ( talk) 17:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 22:28, 2 September 2008 [1].
Disintegration is a 1989 album by
The Cure. After some delayed promises in May and June to work on the article that was pushed back to July, it is finally complete. It was promoted to Good Article status prior to the addition of the final section. Several editors have given it a copyedit. All questions, comments, (and) or concerns will be dealt with in a prompt and timely fashion.
NSR77
T
C
18:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
These issues should be relatively easy to fix. Awadewit ( talk) 23:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC) reply
comment
Image:RobertSmith89.JPG doesnt seem to significantly increase the readers' understanding (
WP:NFCC#8) and therefore its usage may breach FAC #3
Fasach Nua (
talk)
12:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments - sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:55, 25 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Prose spot-checks reveal problems:
Now, I find much of this article well written. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't be scrutinised carefully by a good copy-editor (like Deckiller); we want to be proud of this on the Internet. Tony (talk) 12:04, 26 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Question Is there a reason this article's title does not use parentheses? I strongly believe that the disambig page should be moved to this title while, this FAC article be moved to something with parenthesis. Nergaal ( talk) 17:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC) reply