The article was not promoted 00:38, 27 February 2008.
I'm nominating this article for featured article because its been a GA for a while and been peer reviewed. I'm quite confident this article will make it. Thank you. -- Efe ( talk) 01:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose for 1a. This article really needs a grammar check, a spell check, a punctuation check, and a copy-edit. The following are examples only:
These are simply examples – fixing only these won't fix the article. Copy-edit needed, preferably by a native English speaker. Carré ( talk) 08:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I've copyedited the article. It was copyedited by two users before. -- Efe ( talk) 12:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Also the word "debuted" is used throughout; should this be "made its debut"? And the strange verb "demoed" links to a noun.
In short, I wouldn't like to see this article on the Main Page-- GrahamColm Talk 14:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment This article does indeed have significant prose problems, but I've already begun a copy-edit and expect to be done in a couple of days. It should have no prose-related problems then. indopug ( talk) 09:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted 00:38, 27 February 2008.
I'm nominating this article for featured article because its been a GA for a while and been peer reviewed. I'm quite confident this article will make it. Thank you. -- Efe ( talk) 01:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose for 1a. This article really needs a grammar check, a spell check, a punctuation check, and a copy-edit. The following are examples only:
These are simply examples – fixing only these won't fix the article. Copy-edit needed, preferably by a native English speaker. Carré ( talk) 08:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I've copyedited the article. It was copyedited by two users before. -- Efe ( talk) 12:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Also the word "debuted" is used throughout; should this be "made its debut"? And the strange verb "demoed" links to a noun.
In short, I wouldn't like to see this article on the Main Page-- GrahamColm Talk 14:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment This article does indeed have significant prose problems, but I've already begun a copy-edit and expect to be done in a couple of days. It should have no prose-related problems then. indopug ( talk) 09:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply