The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 00:44, 4 July 2008 [1].
Self-nominator I'm nominating this article for featured article because there has been substantial edits to address the concerns on its first FAC and its now FA ready. It was also peer reviewed (although none of the "opposers" dropped comments on the PR room). --
Efe (
talk)
06:14, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comment - I will leave other editors here to decide wether or not http://www.aCharts.us/ is a reliable source (It has been removed, but the charts table is still based entirely on information from it!) — Wackymacs ( talk ~ edits) 13:24, 27 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Comments -- I remember copy-editing this article the last time it was at FAC
indopug ( talk) 21:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments. - I remember this article from its previous FAC last spring and I'm pleased to see that it is vastly improved. Just a few points:
86.44.27.243 ( talk) 19:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 00:44, 4 July 2008 [1].
Self-nominator I'm nominating this article for featured article because there has been substantial edits to address the concerns on its first FAC and its now FA ready. It was also peer reviewed (although none of the "opposers" dropped comments on the PR room). --
Efe (
talk)
06:14, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comment - I will leave other editors here to decide wether or not http://www.aCharts.us/ is a reliable source (It has been removed, but the charts table is still based entirely on information from it!) — Wackymacs ( talk ~ edits) 13:24, 27 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Comments -- I remember copy-editing this article the last time it was at FAC
indopug ( talk) 21:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments. - I remember this article from its previous FAC last spring and I'm pleased to see that it is vastly improved. Just a few points:
86.44.27.243 ( talk) 19:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC) reply