The article was promoted by Ealdgyth via FACBot ( talk) 25 April 2020 [1].
This article was already at FAC two months ago and was withdrawn to work on mainly prose issues. I've taken the liberty to message all the reviewers back then, if that is OK. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 20:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Iridescent raised this on his talk, so I'm addressing it here. (Although we worked for weeks on this article, I focused on prose in individual sections, and never actually got to read the entire thing through ... I missed this section.)
Iri says, "It might be worth finding a Spanish speaker (ping for SandyGeorgia) to ask es-wiki if anyone there has any idea about why the locals believe a medieval Italian is living on their mountain as I can't be the only reader who finds it odd." The source is in English, and culturally, I don't find this at all odd. Different saints are patrons/protectors of different things in the Catholic religion, and I've seen all kinds of customs similar to this throughout my time in Latin America ... but that still doesn't help understand what the sentence is trying to say. The source says:
And so on; there is plenty in the source to expand the sentence enough to help the reader understand how this came to be, and the source is in English. Will come back to this when I have time; five of us working made tons of progress on the article, [2] but I never found time to read the whole thing. Someone with better prose than I might figure out how to fix the passage. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 01:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
|
Reserving a slot here. I haven't forgotten, just have my plate full right now. I've added this review to my to-do list on my user page. Will get here very soon. I have to earn my 1/3 star. :) Fowler&fowler «Talk» 03:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Ϣere SpielChequers 08:22, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Going through Glacial history and the rest later on. Cheers. CPA-5 ( talk) 09:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Okay that's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 ( talk) 17:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Technical checks
Unsourced info
Quality, reliablity and comprehensiveness of sources
That's all from me. Factotem ( talk) 11:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Apologies for the delay, I've commented on so many different versions of this article that I thought I'd already commented on this FAC but apparently not. Support per my comments at the previous FAC; as per my comment there I don't have an issue with parts of this not meeting "its prose is engaging" given that so much of it is technical detail which needs to be provided but which is impossible to make exciting. ‑ Iridescent 08:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 08:52, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
The article was promoted by Ealdgyth via FACBot ( talk) 25 April 2020 [1].
This article was already at FAC two months ago and was withdrawn to work on mainly prose issues. I've taken the liberty to message all the reviewers back then, if that is OK. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 20:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Iridescent raised this on his talk, so I'm addressing it here. (Although we worked for weeks on this article, I focused on prose in individual sections, and never actually got to read the entire thing through ... I missed this section.)
Iri says, "It might be worth finding a Spanish speaker (ping for SandyGeorgia) to ask es-wiki if anyone there has any idea about why the locals believe a medieval Italian is living on their mountain as I can't be the only reader who finds it odd." The source is in English, and culturally, I don't find this at all odd. Different saints are patrons/protectors of different things in the Catholic religion, and I've seen all kinds of customs similar to this throughout my time in Latin America ... but that still doesn't help understand what the sentence is trying to say. The source says:
And so on; there is plenty in the source to expand the sentence enough to help the reader understand how this came to be, and the source is in English. Will come back to this when I have time; five of us working made tons of progress on the article, [2] but I never found time to read the whole thing. Someone with better prose than I might figure out how to fix the passage. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 01:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
|
Reserving a slot here. I haven't forgotten, just have my plate full right now. I've added this review to my to-do list on my user page. Will get here very soon. I have to earn my 1/3 star. :) Fowler&fowler «Talk» 03:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Ϣere SpielChequers 08:22, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Going through Glacial history and the rest later on. Cheers. CPA-5 ( talk) 09:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Okay that's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 ( talk) 17:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Technical checks
Unsourced info
Quality, reliablity and comprehensiveness of sources
That's all from me. Factotem ( talk) 11:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Apologies for the delay, I've commented on so many different versions of this article that I thought I'd already commented on this FAC but apparently not. Support per my comments at the previous FAC; as per my comment there I don't have an issue with parts of this not meeting "its prose is engaging" given that so much of it is technical detail which needs to be provided but which is impossible to make exciting. ‑ Iridescent 08:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 08:52, 20 April 2020 (UTC)