The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 16:37, 24 January 2012 [1].
Charles Boycott ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I think the article I still think the article meets the FA criteria, no unresolved issues were raised in the last FA nomination. I'm ready to address any concerns that may arise in this. Thnaks in advance to all reviewers. Quasi human | Talk 18:14, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment: The article was archived at its last FAC on 19 September last, after attracting very few substantive comments, no opposes, no supports, and has had no significant edits since that date. It should not suffer the same fate twice. I will read through and check out the prose; meantime, can I suggest a piped link from "bought a commission" to Sale of commissions, for the benefit of the casual reader? Brianboulton ( talk) 01:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments on prose: I'm not completely comfortable with the following phrases and sentences appearing in the article. I don't demand that all of them be changed if you disagree with my opinion. Just trying to help. =)
Leonxlin ( talk) 04:32, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
|1=
in this case] and "br"
HTML attribute). --
Z
09:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
reply
Source review - spotchecks not done.
Comments from Noleander
End Noleander comments. -- Noleander ( talk) 22:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Closing note: we are past the three-week mark, with no consensus to promote. In such cases, the fastest route to promotion is typically a fresh start in a few weeks, assuring that all issues raised have been addressed before returning to FAC. Good luck! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 16:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 16:37, 24 January 2012 [1].
Charles Boycott ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I think the article I still think the article meets the FA criteria, no unresolved issues were raised in the last FA nomination. I'm ready to address any concerns that may arise in this. Thnaks in advance to all reviewers. Quasi human | Talk 18:14, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Comment: The article was archived at its last FAC on 19 September last, after attracting very few substantive comments, no opposes, no supports, and has had no significant edits since that date. It should not suffer the same fate twice. I will read through and check out the prose; meantime, can I suggest a piped link from "bought a commission" to Sale of commissions, for the benefit of the casual reader? Brianboulton ( talk) 01:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Comments on prose: I'm not completely comfortable with the following phrases and sentences appearing in the article. I don't demand that all of them be changed if you disagree with my opinion. Just trying to help. =)
Leonxlin ( talk) 04:32, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
|1=
in this case] and "br"
HTML attribute). --
Z
09:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
reply
Source review - spotchecks not done.
Comments from Noleander
End Noleander comments. -- Noleander ( talk) 22:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Closing note: we are past the three-week mark, with no consensus to promote. In such cases, the fastest route to promotion is typically a fresh start in a few weeks, assuring that all issues raised have been addressed before returning to FAC. Good luck! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 16:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC) reply