The article was not promoted by Laser brain 17:14, 3 February 2011 [1].
Butterfly (Mariah Carey album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I believe it to meet FA criteria. This article was copy-edited by my friend Sarastro1, who is unfamiliar with the subject and text. Thanks everyone for participating. CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 02:12, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Those are quick-comments only from the lead. I'll take my review later this week. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 07:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply
<Off-topic discussion moved to talk page> -- Andy Walsh (talk) 19:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Oppose mainly because there is far too much information here that is better suited for sub-articles, i.e., the song articles. In particular, the two sections about the music videos have little to do directly with the album. Similarly, the singles section is too detailed; IMO a paragraph in "Chart performance" would suffice. Allmusic's and Slant's reviews are retrospectives, yet you quote them before contemporary reviews by the Times, the Voice and Entertainment Weekly (and don't make a distinction between the two anywhere), what gives?—
indopug (
talk) 18:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
Disambig/External Link check - no dabs or dead external links. A few external redirects which may lead to link rot, see them with the tool in the upper right of this page. -- Pres N 01:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by Laser brain 17:14, 3 February 2011 [1].
Butterfly (Mariah Carey album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I believe it to meet FA criteria. This article was copy-edited by my friend Sarastro1, who is unfamiliar with the subject and text. Thanks everyone for participating. CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 02:12, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Those are quick-comments only from the lead. I'll take my review later this week. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 07:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC) reply
<Off-topic discussion moved to talk page> -- Andy Walsh (talk) 19:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Oppose mainly because there is far too much information here that is better suited for sub-articles, i.e., the song articles. In particular, the two sections about the music videos have little to do directly with the album. Similarly, the singles section is too detailed; IMO a paragraph in "Chart performance" would suffice. Allmusic's and Slant's reviews are retrospectives, yet you quote them before contemporary reviews by the Times, the Voice and Entertainment Weekly (and don't make a distinction between the two anywhere), what gives?—
indopug (
talk) 18:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
Disambig/External Link check - no dabs or dead external links. A few external redirects which may lead to link rot, see them with the tool in the upper right of this page. -- Pres N 01:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC) reply