The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 23:51, 31 October 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
Bahia was a Brazilian cruiser which served in both World Wars. Easily the most interesting—and oddest—part of her career was her sinking; depth charges aboard the ship were exploded by accidental 20 mm gunfire, sinking the ship within minutes. As you might imagine, there are not many sources on this ship, and the sources that I did get tend to frequently contradict, which made this a rather difficult article to write. I made attempt to address this within the article using notes, but further comments would be appreciated. Thanks for your reviews! Cheers, — Ed (talk • contribs) 19:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments by Headbomb:
These are style issues mostly, and I don't feel like deciding for the author what is best for the article. I trust that these will be fixed or otherwise be addressed. Content-wise everything looks fine to me. Hence support. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 01:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments: Kirk
Kirk ( talk) 15:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment Support: Farawayman
Farawayman ( talk) 18:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Feedback:
Farawayman ( talk) 21:00, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment by Loosmark
The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 23:51, 31 October 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
Bahia was a Brazilian cruiser which served in both World Wars. Easily the most interesting—and oddest—part of her career was her sinking; depth charges aboard the ship were exploded by accidental 20 mm gunfire, sinking the ship within minutes. As you might imagine, there are not many sources on this ship, and the sources that I did get tend to frequently contradict, which made this a rather difficult article to write. I made attempt to address this within the article using notes, but further comments would be appreciated. Thanks for your reviews! Cheers, — Ed (talk • contribs) 19:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments by Headbomb:
These are style issues mostly, and I don't feel like deciding for the author what is best for the article. I trust that these will be fixed or otherwise be addressed. Content-wise everything looks fine to me. Hence support. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 01:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments: Kirk
Kirk ( talk) 15:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment Support: Farawayman
Farawayman ( talk) 18:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Feedback:
Farawayman ( talk) 21:00, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment by Loosmark