Object Too listy in places, lacks sufficient inline citations and there's many embedded links that need conversion. This wouldn't even make GA right now, so I echo
- Tutmosis's suggestion to go to
peer review.
LuciferMorgan 00:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong object: the
lead needs work; the "History" section is preposterously lacking in detail about the 20th century; "Government and politics" is too short; "Geography" is too listy; "Science and technology" is a stubsection; the wrapping is broken for IE in many places and then, perhaps most importantly, the refs are seriously inadequate. (not enough refs, citation needed tags and inconsistent ref style).
Mikker(...) 03:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Object: Only three inline citations.--
HisSpaceResearch 05:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Object. Not well cited and in some places listy.--
Yannismarou 09:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Object. Not ready for FAC, refer to peer review for more work.
Sandy (
Talk) 16:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Object There are only three citations, there are articles with 50 references that don't make the GA review. Peer review might be the way to go, or take a look at
Canada,
Australia and
India (all FAs) to see the FA standard for country articles.
Baristarim 20:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Object The article lacks a NPOV. It cointains a lot of unreferenced claims.
AlexCovarrubias( Let's talk! ) 17:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Object Too listy in places, lacks sufficient inline citations and there's many embedded links that need conversion. This wouldn't even make GA right now, so I echo
- Tutmosis's suggestion to go to
peer review.
LuciferMorgan 00:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong object: the
lead needs work; the "History" section is preposterously lacking in detail about the 20th century; "Government and politics" is too short; "Geography" is too listy; "Science and technology" is a stubsection; the wrapping is broken for IE in many places and then, perhaps most importantly, the refs are seriously inadequate. (not enough refs, citation needed tags and inconsistent ref style).
Mikker(...) 03:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Object: Only three inline citations.--
HisSpaceResearch 05:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Object. Not well cited and in some places listy.--
Yannismarou 09:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Object. Not ready for FAC, refer to peer review for more work.
Sandy (
Talk) 16:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Object There are only three citations, there are articles with 50 references that don't make the GA review. Peer review might be the way to go, or take a look at
Canada,
Australia and
India (all FAs) to see the FA standard for country articles.
Baristarim 20:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Object The article lacks a NPOV. It cointains a lot of unreferenced claims.
AlexCovarrubias( Let's talk! ) 17:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)reply