The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 14:58, 22 July 2012 [1].
Bentworth ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
After two years on working on Bentworth, this fine article - I believe that it is FA quality. I nominated this article three times in 2010 and 2011, but failed. If it was not for Dr. Blofeld then this article would not be here in the condition it is in now! I, and others, will be willing to do anything to make this article a Featured one. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 19:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Its very disappointing that you didn't even alert myself and any of its other authors before nomming this I have to say. Uwis has messed up the WWII part since I edited it. I don't think its of featured quality. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:00, 21 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Oppose The article currently contains a substantial quantity of unreferenced material, as well as many very short (often single sentence) paragraphs. The quality of the article's prose is often below FA standards - it contains many lengthy and confusing sentences (for instance, "The lower ground to the South and East of the Bentworth and to the south of the nearby villages of Lasham and Shalden drains towards the River Wey which rises to the surface on the west side of Alton."). The number of photos in the 'Notable landmarks' section also seems excessive. Based on this, and the above discussion, I'd suggest that this nomination be withdrawn. Nick-D ( talk) 03:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Suggest withdrawal so the issues regarding stability and the inter-editor dispute may be resolved and their effects on the article dealt with. Nikkimaria ( talk) 14:28, 22 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 14:58, 22 July 2012 [1].
Bentworth ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
After two years on working on Bentworth, this fine article - I believe that it is FA quality. I nominated this article three times in 2010 and 2011, but failed. If it was not for Dr. Blofeld then this article would not be here in the condition it is in now! I, and others, will be willing to do anything to make this article a Featured one. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 19:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Its very disappointing that you didn't even alert myself and any of its other authors before nomming this I have to say. Uwis has messed up the WWII part since I edited it. I don't think its of featured quality. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:00, 21 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Oppose The article currently contains a substantial quantity of unreferenced material, as well as many very short (often single sentence) paragraphs. The quality of the article's prose is often below FA standards - it contains many lengthy and confusing sentences (for instance, "The lower ground to the South and East of the Bentworth and to the south of the nearby villages of Lasham and Shalden drains towards the River Wey which rises to the surface on the west side of Alton."). The number of photos in the 'Notable landmarks' section also seems excessive. Based on this, and the above discussion, I'd suggest that this nomination be withdrawn. Nick-D ( talk) 03:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Suggest withdrawal so the issues regarding stability and the inter-editor dispute may be resolved and their effects on the article dealt with. Nikkimaria ( talk) 14:28, 22 July 2012 (UTC) reply