The article was promoted 21:24, 28 April 2007.
I have been working on this article for about 2 months. I now feel that it is just about ready for FAC. The topic is Beijing opera, the most famous type of Chinese opera. I think I have covered everything about this topic, without going into detail that could best be put in a sub-article. It has been in peer review for over 10 days, but I don't think it is going to get any more comments. Thanks in advance.-- Danaman5 17:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - as I can see that the Peer Review has been "taken care of" I have to say that this is a good and well-referenced article. Booksworm Talk to me! 20:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - All expectations have been addressed. AQu01rius ( User • Talk) 17:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment - Is there a reason for the lack of citations in the lead? -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 09:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment; there seems to be a slight confusion between haushan and haudan in the Dan section: "a haushan combines the status of the qingyi with the sensuality of the huashan" doesn't make sense. Is the second haushan supposed to be haudan? Other than that, this is a fine article. Laïka 12:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Support; an interesting and detailed article. Laïka 16:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your note on the Opera Project. As there is really no connection at all between opera and Chinese opera we don't include the latter in the scope of our project, although personally I have seen a lot of Chinese opera (in China).
One question, re FAC, why is the work of Colin Mackerras (Chinese Theatre/Peking Opera etc) not mentioned? He has written some of the most scholarly material on the subject available in English. Regards. -- Kleinzach 10:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
If You Want To Know How To Listen To A Song.. Which I Am Doin, I Am Tryin To Find A Chinese Opera Song Called 18 miles away. i think, And I Cant Find Out How To Do Iht. A Need it for a school project.. about china.. if anyone can find out. please. tell me somehow.. I have told to do this.. and i need to burn iht on a Cd,,,,,,, —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
89.241.71.107 (
talk) 17:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
reply
I have added citations to the lead, fixed the typo, and added a bit more by Mackerras (I may yet add more from him). I believe I have responded to all of the above points. Please place any new comments below this point (purely for my reference).-- Danaman5 06:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC) reply
(de-indent)Moving the Taiwan sub-section to the end of section 2 might be a bad move, as it would raise questions as to whether Taiwan is part of China or somewhere "around the world", which would surely lead to problems later. I combined them in a different way, tell me if that is satisfactory. I combined the tiny, useless sub-section at the end of section 3 into the training section, but I just can't bring myself to remove all of the sub-sections from section 3. It is just way too much undifferentiated text for my taste. I also combined two sub-sections of section 4 into one. I know that it isn't exactly the set of changes that you would have me make, but since the issue wasn't large enough to merit an oppose from you in the first place, I hope that you can accept this compromise. Take a look and let me know.-- Danaman5 17:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC) reply
I am going out of town this weekend and may have no access to a computer. If anyone posts any additional comments on the article, I will begin to address them on Monday.-- Danaman5 20:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted 21:24, 28 April 2007.
I have been working on this article for about 2 months. I now feel that it is just about ready for FAC. The topic is Beijing opera, the most famous type of Chinese opera. I think I have covered everything about this topic, without going into detail that could best be put in a sub-article. It has been in peer review for over 10 days, but I don't think it is going to get any more comments. Thanks in advance.-- Danaman5 17:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - as I can see that the Peer Review has been "taken care of" I have to say that this is a good and well-referenced article. Booksworm Talk to me! 20:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - All expectations have been addressed. AQu01rius ( User • Talk) 17:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment - Is there a reason for the lack of citations in the lead? -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 09:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment; there seems to be a slight confusion between haushan and haudan in the Dan section: "a haushan combines the status of the qingyi with the sensuality of the huashan" doesn't make sense. Is the second haushan supposed to be haudan? Other than that, this is a fine article. Laïka 12:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Support; an interesting and detailed article. Laïka 16:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your note on the Opera Project. As there is really no connection at all between opera and Chinese opera we don't include the latter in the scope of our project, although personally I have seen a lot of Chinese opera (in China).
One question, re FAC, why is the work of Colin Mackerras (Chinese Theatre/Peking Opera etc) not mentioned? He has written some of the most scholarly material on the subject available in English. Regards. -- Kleinzach 10:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
If You Want To Know How To Listen To A Song.. Which I Am Doin, I Am Tryin To Find A Chinese Opera Song Called 18 miles away. i think, And I Cant Find Out How To Do Iht. A Need it for a school project.. about china.. if anyone can find out. please. tell me somehow.. I have told to do this.. and i need to burn iht on a Cd,,,,,,, —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
89.241.71.107 (
talk) 17:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
reply
I have added citations to the lead, fixed the typo, and added a bit more by Mackerras (I may yet add more from him). I believe I have responded to all of the above points. Please place any new comments below this point (purely for my reference).-- Danaman5 06:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC) reply
(de-indent)Moving the Taiwan sub-section to the end of section 2 might be a bad move, as it would raise questions as to whether Taiwan is part of China or somewhere "around the world", which would surely lead to problems later. I combined them in a different way, tell me if that is satisfactory. I combined the tiny, useless sub-section at the end of section 3 into the training section, but I just can't bring myself to remove all of the sub-sections from section 3. It is just way too much undifferentiated text for my taste. I also combined two sub-sections of section 4 into one. I know that it isn't exactly the set of changes that you would have me make, but since the issue wasn't large enough to merit an oppose from you in the first place, I hope that you can accept this compromise. Take a look and let me know.-- Danaman5 17:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC) reply
I am going out of town this weekend and may have no access to a computer. If anyone posts any additional comments on the article, I will begin to address them on Monday.-- Danaman5 20:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC) reply