The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 23:01, 20 June 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I believe this article about one of the arguably most significant and complex naval battles of World War II is ready for consideration for FA status. The article passed an A-class review with WP:MILHIST. Thank you (in no particular order) to Nick-D, Trekphiler, GoldDragon, Maralia, and Jehochman for significant assistance in expanding and polishing the article. Cla68 ( talk) 20:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply
All I can think of for now. It is a good article, and I am sure I can return to give support pending a more thorough prose analysis. Though other editors will probably get there before me. SGGH ping! 10:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC) reply
{{
coord|09|07|S|160|12|E}}
should include additional meta information., like so: {{
coord|09|07|S|160|12|E|type:landmark_dim:123|name=Destroyer Kikuzuki}}
. List of other types at
WP:GEO#type:T. Using name=Destroyer Kikuzuki names that particular point, tools will display this name instead of the article title. And when I get around to implementing it you can directly describe the coverage of a battle or size of an object in meters using dim: instead of approximating it with scale:. —
Dispenser
13:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replySeveral image concerns:
Other Images are verifiably in the public domain.
Jappalang (
talk)
11:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Comments:
File:KoeiMaruTulagiBombing2.jpg is in public domain... but I think it detracts from the article; it seems to be showing nothing but a splotch.
Jappalang (
talk)
11:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 23:01, 20 June 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I believe this article about one of the arguably most significant and complex naval battles of World War II is ready for consideration for FA status. The article passed an A-class review with WP:MILHIST. Thank you (in no particular order) to Nick-D, Trekphiler, GoldDragon, Maralia, and Jehochman for significant assistance in expanding and polishing the article. Cla68 ( talk) 20:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply
All I can think of for now. It is a good article, and I am sure I can return to give support pending a more thorough prose analysis. Though other editors will probably get there before me. SGGH ping! 10:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC) reply
{{
coord|09|07|S|160|12|E}}
should include additional meta information., like so: {{
coord|09|07|S|160|12|E|type:landmark_dim:123|name=Destroyer Kikuzuki}}
. List of other types at
WP:GEO#type:T. Using name=Destroyer Kikuzuki names that particular point, tools will display this name instead of the article title. And when I get around to implementing it you can directly describe the coverage of a battle or size of an object in meters using dim: instead of approximating it with scale:. —
Dispenser
13:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replySeveral image concerns:
Other Images are verifiably in the public domain.
Jappalang (
talk)
11:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Comments:
File:KoeiMaruTulagiBombing2.jpg is in public domain... but I think it detracts from the article; it seems to be showing nothing but a splotch.
Jappalang (
talk)
11:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
reply