The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 00:50, 30 July 2008 [1].
Self-nom. I wrote this article on a minor naval action of the French Revolutionary Wars back in March when I didn't really have time for an FAC. Now I do, it has passed for GA and I think this meets the FA criteria, so let me know what you think. Jackyd101 ( talk) 07:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look good, links all checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC) reply
And lots more. I have high hopes for this article, but the prose needs to be significantly improved. I can't stress enough how important it is to bring on board fresh editors—word-nerds if possible. Identify them through the edit history pages (edit summaries give them away) of articles on similar topics. They could be valuable future collaborators, too. Oh, and there are rather a lot of red links. Do you think you could write stubs for some of them? Wouldn't take long, surely. TONY (talk) 14:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments Ah yes, there now seems to be a lack of copyeditors. I can barely find any for the main article I'm working on McGill
It seems quite good actually, and I can only find a couple of errors.
Just take out the after. I'll reread the article later. Others, good job. -- Sunsetsunrise ( talk) 18:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 00:50, 30 July 2008 [1].
Self-nom. I wrote this article on a minor naval action of the French Revolutionary Wars back in March when I didn't really have time for an FAC. Now I do, it has passed for GA and I think this meets the FA criteria, so let me know what you think. Jackyd101 ( talk) 07:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - sources look good, links all checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC) reply
And lots more. I have high hopes for this article, but the prose needs to be significantly improved. I can't stress enough how important it is to bring on board fresh editors—word-nerds if possible. Identify them through the edit history pages (edit summaries give them away) of articles on similar topics. They could be valuable future collaborators, too. Oh, and there are rather a lot of red links. Do you think you could write stubs for some of them? Wouldn't take long, surely. TONY (talk) 14:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments Ah yes, there now seems to be a lack of copyeditors. I can barely find any for the main article I'm working on McGill
It seems quite good actually, and I can only find a couple of errors.
Just take out the after. I'll reread the article later. Others, good job. -- Sunsetsunrise ( talk) 18:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC) reply