The article was promoted by Sarastro1 via FACBot ( talk) 20:38, 7 June 2017 [1].
This article is about Adventure Time, an American animated television series created by Pendleton Ward that follows the adventures of Finn (a human boy) and Jake (a magical, shape-shifting dog and Finn's adoptive brother) in a post-apocalyptic world of Ooo. The show has been quite the pop culture phenomenon these last few years, and has won numerous awards, including a Peabody and several Emmys. When I first started working on the article in 2012, it looked like this. Since then, I have greatly expanded it, both in terms of size as well as coverage. I have used the highest-quality sources (all of which are archived, if applicable), and I have had it copy-edited a handful of times, both by myself as well as others. The content is solid, the prose reads well, and it is accurate. While it is currently a good article, I believe it is ready for the next step. Also, if anyone wishes to do source spot-checks, I have access to many of the books, and I'd be willing to send out scans to expedite the process.-- Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Comments from 1989
|
---|
Could you add alt text to the images that are being used in the article? Click here for more information. MCMLXXXIX 19:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC) |
Comments from Dank
|
---|
Comments. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting.
|
Comments from Aoba47
|
---|
|
Comments from Twofingered Typist
|
---|
I did a major c/e of this article for the GOCE in late February. It has had dozens of edits since, most by the article's main author. I had a quick read through it today and it appears to continue to meet the WP|MOS standards. Twofingered Typist ( talk) 18:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC) |
Image Review by Jo-Jo Eumerus
|
---|
ALT text seems OK to me. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 15:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
|
Coordinator note: I think we still need a source review here, which can be requested at the top of WT:FAC. However, I would also like to see more commentary on criteria 1a, 1b and 1c as I'm not sure we have quite covered how far the article meets these yet. Sarastro1 ( talk) 21:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Comments from 97198
|
---|
I've made a number of copyedits myself (mostly grammar, spelling and MOS things). I haven't checked any sources apart from the two I mentioned above, but the fact that in both of these cases there was information not supported by the references gives me pause. I don't have the time or motivation to check 238 references so I'm not sure what the solution is here unless somebody volunteers to do a full source review. 97198 ( talk) 09:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
|
Comments by Mymis
|
---|
Mymis ( talk) 12:51, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Mymis ( talk) 23:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Mymis ( talk) 20:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
|
Source review by Grapple X
|
---|
|
Comments from Moisejp
|
---|
Lead:
Concept and creation:
More comments to follow. Moisejp ( talk) 05:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Conception and creation:
Writing:
Setting and mythology:
Title sequence and music:
Still making my way through the article... now up to Critical reviews:
Academic interest:
Fandom:
I hope to finish this review off in the next couple of days if possible. Thanks for your patience. Moisejp ( talk) 05:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Episodes:
|
Support. I'm satisfied now, thanks. It looks good. Moisejp ( talk) 15:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
The article was promoted by Sarastro1 via FACBot ( talk) 20:38, 7 June 2017 [1].
This article is about Adventure Time, an American animated television series created by Pendleton Ward that follows the adventures of Finn (a human boy) and Jake (a magical, shape-shifting dog and Finn's adoptive brother) in a post-apocalyptic world of Ooo. The show has been quite the pop culture phenomenon these last few years, and has won numerous awards, including a Peabody and several Emmys. When I first started working on the article in 2012, it looked like this. Since then, I have greatly expanded it, both in terms of size as well as coverage. I have used the highest-quality sources (all of which are archived, if applicable), and I have had it copy-edited a handful of times, both by myself as well as others. The content is solid, the prose reads well, and it is accurate. While it is currently a good article, I believe it is ready for the next step. Also, if anyone wishes to do source spot-checks, I have access to many of the books, and I'd be willing to send out scans to expedite the process.-- Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Comments from 1989
|
---|
Could you add alt text to the images that are being used in the article? Click here for more information. MCMLXXXIX 19:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC) |
Comments from Dank
|
---|
Comments. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting.
|
Comments from Aoba47
|
---|
|
Comments from Twofingered Typist
|
---|
I did a major c/e of this article for the GOCE in late February. It has had dozens of edits since, most by the article's main author. I had a quick read through it today and it appears to continue to meet the WP|MOS standards. Twofingered Typist ( talk) 18:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC) |
Image Review by Jo-Jo Eumerus
|
---|
ALT text seems OK to me. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 15:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
|
Coordinator note: I think we still need a source review here, which can be requested at the top of WT:FAC. However, I would also like to see more commentary on criteria 1a, 1b and 1c as I'm not sure we have quite covered how far the article meets these yet. Sarastro1 ( talk) 21:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Comments from 97198
|
---|
I've made a number of copyedits myself (mostly grammar, spelling and MOS things). I haven't checked any sources apart from the two I mentioned above, but the fact that in both of these cases there was information not supported by the references gives me pause. I don't have the time or motivation to check 238 references so I'm not sure what the solution is here unless somebody volunteers to do a full source review. 97198 ( talk) 09:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
|
Comments by Mymis
|
---|
Mymis ( talk) 12:51, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Mymis ( talk) 23:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Mymis ( talk) 20:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
|
Source review by Grapple X
|
---|
|
Comments from Moisejp
|
---|
Lead:
Concept and creation:
More comments to follow. Moisejp ( talk) 05:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Conception and creation:
Writing:
Setting and mythology:
Title sequence and music:
Still making my way through the article... now up to Critical reviews:
Academic interest:
Fandom:
I hope to finish this review off in the next couple of days if possible. Thanks for your patience. Moisejp ( talk) 05:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Episodes:
|
Support. I'm satisfied now, thanks. It looks good. Moisejp ( talk) 15:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)