The article was not promoted 00:07, 17 May 2008.
previous FAC (00:05, 19 April 2008)
I originally nominated this article for FA a few weeks back, but it was failed. It has since gone through a
thorough peer review, meaning it has gone from
this to
this (see
diff). I am confident, with the work that has already taken place on the article that it meets
the FA criteria currently in place. Thanks,
D.M.N. (
talk) 16:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
reply
Many thanks for the comments, Oldelpaso. :) D.M.N. ( talk) 13:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC) reply
'Oppose - This is good, but a few changes needed before I can support:
Comment:
Oppose—Cr 1a:
Now, please have the whole article copy-edited thoroughly; this is not at all good enough for featured status, which explicitly requires a "professional" standard of writing. Tony (talk) 08:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC) reply
No comments after five days, so it gets archived with a 3 Support, 2 Oppose consensus. It's NOT my fault if editors don't get back to me with further comments, is it? Disgraceful. D.M.N. ( talk) 09:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted 00:07, 17 May 2008.
previous FAC (00:05, 19 April 2008)
I originally nominated this article for FA a few weeks back, but it was failed. It has since gone through a
thorough peer review, meaning it has gone from
this to
this (see
diff). I am confident, with the work that has already taken place on the article that it meets
the FA criteria currently in place. Thanks,
D.M.N. (
talk) 16:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
reply
Many thanks for the comments, Oldelpaso. :) D.M.N. ( talk) 13:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC) reply
'Oppose - This is good, but a few changes needed before I can support:
Comment:
Oppose—Cr 1a:
Now, please have the whole article copy-edited thoroughly; this is not at all good enough for featured status, which explicitly requires a "professional" standard of writing. Tony (talk) 08:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC) reply
No comments after five days, so it gets archived with a 3 Support, 2 Oppose consensus. It's NOT my fault if editors don't get back to me with further comments, is it? Disgraceful. D.M.N. ( talk) 09:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC) reply