Floquenbeam's review (FRV) determines whether anything done on Wikipedia is consistent with policy, common sense, standards of behaviour, and the will of Floquenbeam. Any action, edit, fraternal banter, or thing that takes place on Wikipedia is subject to its scope. Its purpose is for Floquenbeam to review everything and make decisions based on executive fiat.
To request Floquenbeam's review, please first read the "purpose" section to make sure that it is in scope. Then, follow the instructions below.
Formal review processes |
---|
|
For RfCs, community discussions, and to review closes of other reviews: |
Administrators' noticeboard |
In bot-related matters: |
|
Discussion about closes prior to closing: |
Floquenbeam's review may be used to request Floquenbeam's ruling on anything whatsoever
Floquenbeam's review should not be used to question anything Floquenbeam or User:Bishzilla have done.
You must leave a notice on the editor's talk page.
The use of ping or the notification system is not sufficient for this purpose. SandyGeorgia can live without it; why can't you?
Any editor may express their opinion about an action being reviewed, but only Floquenbeam's view matters. In the Floquenbeam's review discussion, please do not type one of the following opinions preceded by an asterisk (*) and surrounded by three apostrophes (''') on either side unless you are Floquenbeam:
If you have additional thoughts to share, you may type this after the opinion. Place four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your entry, which should be placed below the entries of all previous editors.
Remember: Lecturing Floq like he's a child and then appending "I mean this in the nicest way possible" doesn’t work the way you think it does. DO NOT say "With all due respect" as everyone knows this is simply a polite way of saying "get lost".
Discussions are open for as long as Floquenbeam wants, and may only be closed by him. Floquenbeam should make a closing statement that summarizes the consensus reached in the discussion and clearly states the outcome, if he feels like it. Suggested outcomes include endorsed, overturned, no consensus or meh, but can be whatever he wants them to be. When possible, Floq should implement the outcome. If it is not, please contact User:Bishzilla
Abide by the decision, or appeal to User:Bishzilla, but please note, that might result in you being pocketed with Jimbo Wales.
Floquenbeam's review (FRV) determines whether anything done on Wikipedia is consistent with policy, common sense, standards of behaviour, and the will of Floquenbeam. Any action, edit, fraternal banter, or thing that takes place on Wikipedia is subject to its scope. Its purpose is for Floquenbeam to review everything and make decisions based on executive fiat.
To request Floquenbeam's review, please first read the "purpose" section to make sure that it is in scope. Then, follow the instructions below.
Formal review processes |
---|
|
For RfCs, community discussions, and to review closes of other reviews: |
Administrators' noticeboard |
In bot-related matters: |
|
Discussion about closes prior to closing: |
Floquenbeam's review may be used to request Floquenbeam's ruling on anything whatsoever
Floquenbeam's review should not be used to question anything Floquenbeam or User:Bishzilla have done.
You must leave a notice on the editor's talk page.
The use of ping or the notification system is not sufficient for this purpose. SandyGeorgia can live without it; why can't you?
Any editor may express their opinion about an action being reviewed, but only Floquenbeam's view matters. In the Floquenbeam's review discussion, please do not type one of the following opinions preceded by an asterisk (*) and surrounded by three apostrophes (''') on either side unless you are Floquenbeam:
If you have additional thoughts to share, you may type this after the opinion. Place four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your entry, which should be placed below the entries of all previous editors.
Remember: Lecturing Floq like he's a child and then appending "I mean this in the nicest way possible" doesn’t work the way you think it does. DO NOT say "With all due respect" as everyone knows this is simply a polite way of saying "get lost".
Discussions are open for as long as Floquenbeam wants, and may only be closed by him. Floquenbeam should make a closing statement that summarizes the consensus reached in the discussion and clearly states the outcome, if he feels like it. Suggested outcomes include endorsed, overturned, no consensus or meh, but can be whatever he wants them to be. When possible, Floq should implement the outcome. If it is not, please contact User:Bishzilla
Abide by the decision, or appeal to User:Bishzilla, but please note, that might result in you being pocketed with Jimbo Wales.