symode09 ( talk · contribs) I just want to be reveiwed so I can see where I can improve and eventually work my way upto an administrator in the fututre. symode09 02:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
I noted two things immediately in reviewing your contributions. First, on the bad side, I noticed you do not use edit summaries very much. I would strongly encourage you to add a small note about your edits to the edit summary field when making changes. It does not have to be anything in-depth, just a brief explanation of the edit. Edit summaries are very useful to other editors and helps us all keep track of page histories more easily. Second, on the good side, I noticed that you are very responsive to constructive criticism and seem interested in learning how to do things the "right" way. This kind of positive and receptive attitude is exactly what Wikipedia needs in its editors. We all went through a learning curve and how an editor responds to that curve says quite a bit about them.
You seem like a good editor, but I would encourage you to get more widely involved. This is not to disparage your work as a wikignome fixing things, your work with photos or your work on layout issues. Those are all good things. However, if you're looking to eventually become an admin, there are some things I would suggest. If you're uncomfortable with participating in WP:RFA yet, help out on WP:ER. It usually has a backlog and will help you become more comfortable with reviewing and providing feedback to other editors. WP:XFD can always use another reasonable voice, as there are often many cases with very few opinions voiced. WP:BACKLOG, as the name suggests, could always use some attention and could help you with moving towards more rewriting and content addition. You might also want to participate in WP:3O and WP:GAC, as outside views are not only welcomed, but desirable. Vassyana 12:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Questions
symode09 ( talk · contribs) I just want to be reveiwed so I can see where I can improve and eventually work my way upto an administrator in the fututre. symode09 02:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
I noted two things immediately in reviewing your contributions. First, on the bad side, I noticed you do not use edit summaries very much. I would strongly encourage you to add a small note about your edits to the edit summary field when making changes. It does not have to be anything in-depth, just a brief explanation of the edit. Edit summaries are very useful to other editors and helps us all keep track of page histories more easily. Second, on the good side, I noticed that you are very responsive to constructive criticism and seem interested in learning how to do things the "right" way. This kind of positive and receptive attitude is exactly what Wikipedia needs in its editors. We all went through a learning curve and how an editor responds to that curve says quite a bit about them.
You seem like a good editor, but I would encourage you to get more widely involved. This is not to disparage your work as a wikignome fixing things, your work with photos or your work on layout issues. Those are all good things. However, if you're looking to eventually become an admin, there are some things I would suggest. If you're uncomfortable with participating in WP:RFA yet, help out on WP:ER. It usually has a backlog and will help you become more comfortable with reviewing and providing feedback to other editors. WP:XFD can always use another reasonable voice, as there are often many cases with very few opinions voiced. WP:BACKLOG, as the name suggests, could always use some attention and could help you with moving towards more rewriting and content addition. You might also want to participate in WP:3O and WP:GAC, as outside views are not only welcomed, but desirable. Vassyana 12:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Questions