theunicyclegirl ( talk · contribs) Theunicyclegirl 15:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
Brief comments: Sounds like you've got a handle on using warning templates, which is a very good thing. I'd dip my hands into WP:UCFD, WP:TFD and WP:CFD, which I believe will help ease your way into the truly important WP:AFD. Keep fighting vandalism, and take out a book from time to time from your library to add contents to the encyclopedia. Xiner ( talk, email) 16:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Well first and foremost, great job fighting vandalism and nice job filtering new pages. You are great at knowing what to do when the occasion arises (i.e. the Bobo incident :) ). You have a decent mainspace count, but your Wikipedia edit count is low. Consider joining a Wikiproject (I like WP:MOTD a TON!), or get involved in some simple XfD's. Keep up the great work! --Cremepuff222 ( talk, review me!) 00:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm going to offer a stronger dose of criticism, but it's meant with love. I saw you wrote an article about a silent film from 1915, but you've hardly written anything else. In your last 400 edits, I could not find a single substantive contribution to the encyclopedia (not counting vandalism reversions, which are praiseworthy). There's no rule that requires you to contribute material to the encyclopedia, but everyone agrees that an ideal, well-rounded editor makes that one of her goals and priorities. Or if you don't want to add material, you could try WP:CLEANUP to work on existing bad articles. Where will you find the time to do that? You could start by tinkering less with your user page. I wish you good luck. YechielMan 00:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to see consistent use of informative edit summaries. I'd also like you to avoid practical jokes on widely seen pages such as Jimbo's user page. This is an encyclopeida, not a play-ground. At most, a joke on your own page or that of a close friend might be appropriate. Anything more than that is a distriction and a waste of other people's time. Thanks for participatig in editor review. Please let me know if there is ever anything I can help with. Johntex\ talk 05:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I have several comments.
Overall, you're a very promising user. You haven't said whether you aim to be an admin or not; if you do, you'll need at least another 1500 edits until you're ready for RfA (it's not as hard as it sounds, however, particularly with lots of vandal fighting). But in a couple of months I'd be happy to nominate you for adminship. Keep up the good work! :) Wal ton Vivat Regina! 19:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments:
Advice:
Considering you've been editing for only two months (unless the big break was with another user name or IP), you are doing great. Being civil with the vandals, who are also mostly newbies, is a big plus. Don't lose that attitude as you gain experience, especially in AfD discussions. I think WP loses many valuable, potential contributors because their first contact is seeing their new baby (first article) thrown off the end of the dock to the sound of less than civil comments. -- killing sparrows (chirp!) 04:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Questions
theunicyclegirl ( talk · contribs) Theunicyclegirl 15:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
Brief comments: Sounds like you've got a handle on using warning templates, which is a very good thing. I'd dip my hands into WP:UCFD, WP:TFD and WP:CFD, which I believe will help ease your way into the truly important WP:AFD. Keep fighting vandalism, and take out a book from time to time from your library to add contents to the encyclopedia. Xiner ( talk, email) 16:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Well first and foremost, great job fighting vandalism and nice job filtering new pages. You are great at knowing what to do when the occasion arises (i.e. the Bobo incident :) ). You have a decent mainspace count, but your Wikipedia edit count is low. Consider joining a Wikiproject (I like WP:MOTD a TON!), or get involved in some simple XfD's. Keep up the great work! --Cremepuff222 ( talk, review me!) 00:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm going to offer a stronger dose of criticism, but it's meant with love. I saw you wrote an article about a silent film from 1915, but you've hardly written anything else. In your last 400 edits, I could not find a single substantive contribution to the encyclopedia (not counting vandalism reversions, which are praiseworthy). There's no rule that requires you to contribute material to the encyclopedia, but everyone agrees that an ideal, well-rounded editor makes that one of her goals and priorities. Or if you don't want to add material, you could try WP:CLEANUP to work on existing bad articles. Where will you find the time to do that? You could start by tinkering less with your user page. I wish you good luck. YechielMan 00:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to see consistent use of informative edit summaries. I'd also like you to avoid practical jokes on widely seen pages such as Jimbo's user page. This is an encyclopeida, not a play-ground. At most, a joke on your own page or that of a close friend might be appropriate. Anything more than that is a distriction and a waste of other people's time. Thanks for participatig in editor review. Please let me know if there is ever anything I can help with. Johntex\ talk 05:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I have several comments.
Overall, you're a very promising user. You haven't said whether you aim to be an admin or not; if you do, you'll need at least another 1500 edits until you're ready for RfA (it's not as hard as it sounds, however, particularly with lots of vandal fighting). But in a couple of months I'd be happy to nominate you for adminship. Keep up the good work! :) Wal ton Vivat Regina! 19:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments:
Advice:
Considering you've been editing for only two months (unless the big break was with another user name or IP), you are doing great. Being civil with the vandals, who are also mostly newbies, is a big plus. Don't lose that attitude as you gain experience, especially in AfD discussions. I think WP loses many valuable, potential contributors because their first contact is seeing their new baby (first article) thrown off the end of the dock to the sound of less than civil comments. -- killing sparrows (chirp!) 04:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Questions