The Haunted Angel (
talk ·
contribs) Hey; I suppose I went for this editor review as a clock in to see how I'm doing. I suppose the ultimate goal is adminship, but I wouldn't say I'm quite ready for the admin coaching yet. This is just a bit of a check up to see just how I'm doing 'n all :) ≈
The Haunted Angel
23:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
Hey The Haunted Angel. I've known you around Wikipedia for a while now, and you're a very helpful user who does very good edits. You've helped with the
Coheed and Cambria articles greatly, that article just one of many. You're a nice, calm editor, who has a good sense of humour, but while maintaining a humourous way, your edits are still up to scratch. As with any good editor, you revert vandalism well and warn/notify the user of it.
I can't really think of any advice for you, you seem to do everything so well. You seem to have done more mainspace edits than me overall, something which I have improved greatly on now.
As with me, I believe you would make a good admin in the months to come, and I wish you the best of luck with that.
To sum this review up:
Keep it up, — jacĸrм ( talk) 00:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
From what I've seen so far, you are impartial even when your own feelings and beliefs are involved. You think about your moves before you make them, which is highly commendable and when you speak for me you even surpass my own chess moves. Rev. Michael S. Margolin ( talk) 22:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Comments
You proudly proclaim your belief that Wikipedia is not censored so I know you'll support my right to free speech when I say that the the grammar Nazi box (4.SS-Division) on your user page makes me think you're a dickhead. Nick mallory 15:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
First, you tell me that I cannot update the Gorgoroth page without sourcing my claims. So, I go back and source my claims perfectly and you still delete what I posted and give me a warning. You just don't care about keeping this article accurate. I made the same changes from before and this time added sources and links to official band pages that PROVE my statements to be true and you still delete them. UNBELIEVABLE! - 13:51, December 27, 2007
Questions
The Haunted Angel (
talk ·
contribs) Hey; I suppose I went for this editor review as a clock in to see how I'm doing. I suppose the ultimate goal is adminship, but I wouldn't say I'm quite ready for the admin coaching yet. This is just a bit of a check up to see just how I'm doing 'n all :) ≈
The Haunted Angel
23:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
Hey The Haunted Angel. I've known you around Wikipedia for a while now, and you're a very helpful user who does very good edits. You've helped with the
Coheed and Cambria articles greatly, that article just one of many. You're a nice, calm editor, who has a good sense of humour, but while maintaining a humourous way, your edits are still up to scratch. As with any good editor, you revert vandalism well and warn/notify the user of it.
I can't really think of any advice for you, you seem to do everything so well. You seem to have done more mainspace edits than me overall, something which I have improved greatly on now.
As with me, I believe you would make a good admin in the months to come, and I wish you the best of luck with that.
To sum this review up:
Keep it up, — jacĸrм ( talk) 00:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
From what I've seen so far, you are impartial even when your own feelings and beliefs are involved. You think about your moves before you make them, which is highly commendable and when you speak for me you even surpass my own chess moves. Rev. Michael S. Margolin ( talk) 22:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Comments
You proudly proclaim your belief that Wikipedia is not censored so I know you'll support my right to free speech when I say that the the grammar Nazi box (4.SS-Division) on your user page makes me think you're a dickhead. Nick mallory 15:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
First, you tell me that I cannot update the Gorgoroth page without sourcing my claims. So, I go back and source my claims perfectly and you still delete what I posted and give me a warning. You just don't care about keeping this article accurate. I made the same changes from before and this time added sources and links to official band pages that PROVE my statements to be true and you still delete them. UNBELIEVABLE! - 13:51, December 27, 2007
Questions