Sanchom ( talk · contribs) I've been a fairly active contributor for the past few months, but have no feedback as regards my editing. I've attempted to bring one article towards Good Article status, but there has been little feedback from Peer Reviews or Good Article candidacy. I'm hoping that this forum will give me some nice suggestions for improvement. Sancho 09:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
You seem to have a healthy amount of discussion between other users. It is good if there is continual discussion on the different articles. Your number and range of Wikipedia-type edits seem good.
You should try to do some more templating. I would also suggest that maybe you should join a WikiProject of something that may interest you. It is a good way to collaborate with people on things in that particular subject. Judging from the number of edits to an article, I would suggest you use the preview button more. Possibly also spend less time on your userpages.
I hope this helps. Simply south 23:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
- View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- West 49: This article was listed at AfD as spam. With a little effort, I was able to rescue it.
- Cormontibo: A geography stub that I found a location and created a map for
- Pogs: Initially poorly referenced.
- Freston_Tower, a totally random article that I found some references and additional information for. I was able to get a website owner to release a picture under the GFDL for this article
- Perhaps this is technically the opposite of a contribution, but I have also worked at removing copyright violations.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Yes, I have noticed a few times in the past notices posted to either the administrator noticeboard or wikiquette alerts. Upon attempting to help with the situation, sometimes one editor will appear to me not to be contributing with good faith or acting uncivilly. I've always found that reacting with a very measured and an intentionally civil tone brings the other editor to participate better in the discussion. I will continue to deal with stressful situations like this in the future. I have not yet needed to take a break from a dispute, but I leave this option open.
Additional Questions from Dfrg. msc:
Borrowed from Glen ( talk · contribs), I'm sure he wont mind. These should test you editing skills, and show if you have any weaknesses which you can work on. So, just write your answer next to the Question. Good luck.
Speedy Delete or not:
Vandalism or or not:
Have fun! Dfrg. msc 07:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Sanchom ( talk · contribs) I've been a fairly active contributor for the past few months, but have no feedback as regards my editing. I've attempted to bring one article towards Good Article status, but there has been little feedback from Peer Reviews or Good Article candidacy. I'm hoping that this forum will give me some nice suggestions for improvement. Sancho 09:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
You seem to have a healthy amount of discussion between other users. It is good if there is continual discussion on the different articles. Your number and range of Wikipedia-type edits seem good.
You should try to do some more templating. I would also suggest that maybe you should join a WikiProject of something that may interest you. It is a good way to collaborate with people on things in that particular subject. Judging from the number of edits to an article, I would suggest you use the preview button more. Possibly also spend less time on your userpages.
I hope this helps. Simply south 23:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
- View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- West 49: This article was listed at AfD as spam. With a little effort, I was able to rescue it.
- Cormontibo: A geography stub that I found a location and created a map for
- Pogs: Initially poorly referenced.
- Freston_Tower, a totally random article that I found some references and additional information for. I was able to get a website owner to release a picture under the GFDL for this article
- Perhaps this is technically the opposite of a contribution, but I have also worked at removing copyright violations.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Yes, I have noticed a few times in the past notices posted to either the administrator noticeboard or wikiquette alerts. Upon attempting to help with the situation, sometimes one editor will appear to me not to be contributing with good faith or acting uncivilly. I've always found that reacting with a very measured and an intentionally civil tone brings the other editor to participate better in the discussion. I will continue to deal with stressful situations like this in the future. I have not yet needed to take a break from a dispute, but I leave this option open.
Additional Questions from Dfrg. msc:
Borrowed from Glen ( talk · contribs), I'm sure he wont mind. These should test you editing skills, and show if you have any weaknesses which you can work on. So, just write your answer next to the Question. Good luck.
Speedy Delete or not:
Vandalism or or not:
Have fun! Dfrg. msc 07:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)