Plau
Plau ( talk · contribs · count) Although I am not the most active user, I try to help out as much as I can. I know not everyone has been happy with my edits, but they were all done in good faith. - Plau ( talk) 03:06, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Reviews
- Hi Plau, sorry for the delay in getting a review for you - we're slowly
catching up with the backlog! On to my review...
- User conduct
- Edit summaries: You do not very often use edit summaries - only 1/2 the time for your major edits, and 70% of your minor edits. It is useful to put a comment explaining what you are doing there, as people who watch the article can see what's happening. It can be simple, like "added ref" or "corrected link", or something like that.
- Constructive comments on talk pages: Your comments explain your position on issues clearly, without either patronising or alienating other editors. I see a lot of discussions about whether articles should be merged, and although I may not always agree with your position, I respect your opinion - from what I can see they are with the aim of improving the encyclopedia.
- Attitude towards others: Generally, I get a similar impression as on your talk page comments - you know what you want to say, and say it! Sometimes it comes across as a bit terse, but that could be just me!
- Edits
- Automated Edits: I see that you have used AWB on occasion (but not since January), and your use looked accurate.
- Article vs non-article: Almost 80% of your edits are to articles - very good!
- Summary
- You are obviously here to help build an authoritative encyclopedia. I've not really got any criticisms to make (apart from suggesting that you use edit summaries!) Keep up the good work!
Regards, -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 19:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Questions
- What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
- I primarily edit Anime related articles, but I also do fix minor errors hear and there.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Yes, I usually try to resolve these things on the talk page, and try to compromise if I feel it's the right thing to do.
Plau
Plau ( talk · contribs · count) Although I am not the most active user, I try to help out as much as I can. I know not everyone has been happy with my edits, but they were all done in good faith. - Plau ( talk) 03:06, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Reviews
- Hi Plau, sorry for the delay in getting a review for you - we're slowly
catching up with the backlog! On to my review...
- User conduct
- Edit summaries: You do not very often use edit summaries - only 1/2 the time for your major edits, and 70% of your minor edits. It is useful to put a comment explaining what you are doing there, as people who watch the article can see what's happening. It can be simple, like "added ref" or "corrected link", or something like that.
- Constructive comments on talk pages: Your comments explain your position on issues clearly, without either patronising or alienating other editors. I see a lot of discussions about whether articles should be merged, and although I may not always agree with your position, I respect your opinion - from what I can see they are with the aim of improving the encyclopedia.
- Attitude towards others: Generally, I get a similar impression as on your talk page comments - you know what you want to say, and say it! Sometimes it comes across as a bit terse, but that could be just me!
- Edits
- Automated Edits: I see that you have used AWB on occasion (but not since January), and your use looked accurate.
- Article vs non-article: Almost 80% of your edits are to articles - very good!
- Summary
- You are obviously here to help build an authoritative encyclopedia. I've not really got any criticisms to make (apart from suggesting that you use edit summaries!) Keep up the good work!
Regards, -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 19:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Questions
- What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
- I primarily edit Anime related articles, but I also do fix minor errors hear and there.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Yes, I usually try to resolve these things on the talk page, and try to compromise if I feel it's the right thing to do.