The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Mono ( talk · contribs · count) I periodically look for feedback to become a better editor. — mono 19:49, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Questions
Reviews
Comment
Well, when you've got 4446 edits in user talk space alone, it probably will not look favorable on you. One can use IRC (or whatever you want to call it) and spend less time fixing typos in comments on the talk page. It seems that from 11:38, 14 June 2010 to 13:58, 16 June 2010 you had made significant progress in vandalfighting skills (in less than three days) which is commendable. It can be improved upon if you started with a level one warning rather than jumping to two- or three-level warnings even after the first warning that you've issued. But the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010 was the best success I've seen in your participation in (and/or coordination of) WikiProject management (I hear you're going to participate in the next Backlog elimination drive, several more Apple (computer) WikiProjects, and fulfill the offices of Reviewer). :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 21:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
You've certainly improved over the past month or so, but there is still a long way to go. I think you've finally found your "niche", so hopefully this will work well for you. — fetch · comms 23:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Mixed views
Whilst I'd congratulate your honesty in (1) starting this comments page, and (2) being prepared to improve other editors' helpings, I'd have to urge caution in the latter. In this case, I feel you could have worded your comments more appropriately. User:Chzz is a very experienced editor and, as my brilliant mentor ever since I've got to know him on the IRC channel, has proved to be the most helpful editor one could possibly hope to meet on WP. I do feel that, if you had glanced at his Talk page before you left your comments, you may have altered your wording. -- Trafford09 ( talk) 22:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
A bit later, I've come back for more feedback, but I didn't want to create another subpage. If you'd like more up-to-date info or other stuff, just email me. The stuff from before probably isn't even valid now, but whatevs. ℳono feedback 03:09, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Mono ( talk · contribs · count) I periodically look for feedback to become a better editor. — mono 19:49, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Questions
Reviews
Comment
Well, when you've got 4446 edits in user talk space alone, it probably will not look favorable on you. One can use IRC (or whatever you want to call it) and spend less time fixing typos in comments on the talk page. It seems that from 11:38, 14 June 2010 to 13:58, 16 June 2010 you had made significant progress in vandalfighting skills (in less than three days) which is commendable. It can be improved upon if you started with a level one warning rather than jumping to two- or three-level warnings even after the first warning that you've issued. But the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010 was the best success I've seen in your participation in (and/or coordination of) WikiProject management (I hear you're going to participate in the next Backlog elimination drive, several more Apple (computer) WikiProjects, and fulfill the offices of Reviewer). :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 21:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
You've certainly improved over the past month or so, but there is still a long way to go. I think you've finally found your "niche", so hopefully this will work well for you. — fetch · comms 23:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Mixed views
Whilst I'd congratulate your honesty in (1) starting this comments page, and (2) being prepared to improve other editors' helpings, I'd have to urge caution in the latter. In this case, I feel you could have worded your comments more appropriately. User:Chzz is a very experienced editor and, as my brilliant mentor ever since I've got to know him on the IRC channel, has proved to be the most helpful editor one could possibly hope to meet on WP. I do feel that, if you had glanced at his Talk page before you left your comments, you may have altered your wording. -- Trafford09 ( talk) 22:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
A bit later, I've come back for more feedback, but I didn't want to create another subpage. If you'd like more up-to-date info or other stuff, just email me. The stuff from before probably isn't even valid now, but whatevs. ℳono feedback 03:09, 13 September 2010 (UTC)