Magister Scienta ( talk · contribs · count) Hello, after recently reaching the 2,000 edit mark, I realized that I wanted to further enhance my editing abilities. I thought one of the best ways to do this was to see what aspects of my editing other users thought I should change, thus this forum was perfect. Any comment, even the hard-to-hear ones, are greatly appreciated. Magister Scienta talk 00:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Questions
Reviews
I've seen you around in the file namespace on more than one occasion. You have done a good job working there. Looking over your article edits, it appears that the majority of your article namespace work is copyediting. I don't see any issues with the copyedits, they all appear to be well made edits. Nice work on Amon of Judah, I see that you helped bring the article up to good article status. Your attitude in discussions is also very commendable. Looking through your talk page history, you are very polite and courteous to other editors. I was particularly impressed by this discussion. The only thing I noticed was a recent decline in article namespace editing. According to X!'s tool, last month only about 6% of your editing was in articlespace. There is nothing problematic with that, I see that you worked heavily in categorization and templates during that time. However, if you plan to run for adminship in the future, you might want to be more active in article space. Overall though, there is nothing really to make suggestions on, you're work here is excellent. I hope this editor review helps you out. If you want me to elaborate on anything I said, I wouldn't mind doing so. Best wishes, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Magister Scienta ( talk · contribs · count) Hello, after recently reaching the 2,000 edit mark, I realized that I wanted to further enhance my editing abilities. I thought one of the best ways to do this was to see what aspects of my editing other users thought I should change, thus this forum was perfect. Any comment, even the hard-to-hear ones, are greatly appreciated. Magister Scienta talk 00:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Questions
Reviews
I've seen you around in the file namespace on more than one occasion. You have done a good job working there. Looking over your article edits, it appears that the majority of your article namespace work is copyediting. I don't see any issues with the copyedits, they all appear to be well made edits. Nice work on Amon of Judah, I see that you helped bring the article up to good article status. Your attitude in discussions is also very commendable. Looking through your talk page history, you are very polite and courteous to other editors. I was particularly impressed by this discussion. The only thing I noticed was a recent decline in article namespace editing. According to X!'s tool, last month only about 6% of your editing was in articlespace. There is nothing problematic with that, I see that you worked heavily in categorization and templates during that time. However, if you plan to run for adminship in the future, you might want to be more active in article space. Overall though, there is nothing really to make suggestions on, you're work here is excellent. I hope this editor review helps you out. If you want me to elaborate on anything I said, I wouldn't mind doing so. Best wishes, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)