Macys123 (
talk·contribs) I created this account in September 2006, but made my first edit in June 2007. I did not know that Wikipedia could be edited until December 2006. Later, I decided to investigate on encyclopedias, and created my first article. Before creating a RfA, I'll like to be reviewed. Macy's12322:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Reviews
You participate rather a lot in XfD discussions which is good, but I notice that more than a few of your "arguments" boil down to "per nom" or "as above". Examples are
[1],
[2], and
[3] from the first page of your contribs. Such comments really are of questionable usefulness unless a
snowball is forming, since XfD is not a vote, even a brief discussion of the merits or otherwise of the article is very desirable. I also note that you don't do this all of the time, and your other vandal-fighting work seems to be solid. There doesn't seem to be any substantial article editing in your recent history, apart from correcting typos, which may cause you problems at RFA with some particularly picky editors. Hope this helps!
Lankiveil (
talk)
15:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC).reply
I would suggest that you spend some more time on Wikipedia and dive into more complex areas of Wikipeida, such as writing articles and vandal fighting. I am satisfied with your translation work. That is great. But I will suggest staying away from RFA for a while. Thanks
MarlithT/
C00:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I've made mistakes. I have been involved in one very minor conflict that was quickly and smoothly resolved.
Macys123 (
talk·contribs) I created this account in September 2006, but made my first edit in June 2007. I did not know that Wikipedia could be edited until December 2006. Later, I decided to investigate on encyclopedias, and created my first article. Before creating a RfA, I'll like to be reviewed. Macy's12322:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Reviews
You participate rather a lot in XfD discussions which is good, but I notice that more than a few of your "arguments" boil down to "per nom" or "as above". Examples are
[1],
[2], and
[3] from the first page of your contribs. Such comments really are of questionable usefulness unless a
snowball is forming, since XfD is not a vote, even a brief discussion of the merits or otherwise of the article is very desirable. I also note that you don't do this all of the time, and your other vandal-fighting work seems to be solid. There doesn't seem to be any substantial article editing in your recent history, apart from correcting typos, which may cause you problems at RFA with some particularly picky editors. Hope this helps!
Lankiveil (
talk)
15:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC).reply
I would suggest that you spend some more time on Wikipedia and dive into more complex areas of Wikipeida, such as writing articles and vandal fighting. I am satisfied with your translation work. That is great. But I will suggest staying away from RFA for a while. Thanks
MarlithT/
C00:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I've made mistakes. I have been involved in one very minor conflict that was quickly and smoothly resolved.