Guerillero ( talk · contribs · count) I am looking at doing a RfA sometime In the future and I would like to know if that is a viable idea. Guerillero | My Talk 20:35, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Questions
Reviews
First off: I'd support. You have clue, you manage to exist in a cesspool of drama (FS) without going insane or contributing to it, and you're a dedicated worker bee.
My suggestion is to give it a few more months. If your edit count drops too low in May/June/July then running in August will get you raised eyebrows and a bunch of opposes. If you can get 250+ edits for those months then running in August will work. I only urge this conservative strategy because 1) I don't want you to get slaughtered for no good reason, and 2) if you run now and don't get promoted, you won't be realisticly able to run until December.
I believe you are an asset to Wikipedia. Your work in the Campus/Online Ambassador program is excellent. You are a knowledgeable editor with a well-measured response. Your content is a bit low but that's really easy to make up for. Keep up the good work- I am proud of you! Basket of Puppies 02:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Guerillero, you're a bright, clueful user who's on the right track. If you want to pass RfA, I'd just address what Sven mentioned (edit summaries, a bit more sustained activity, etc.) and make sure you figure out what admin work you want to do—AIV, RfPP, XfD, CSD, RM, SPI, etc.—and make sure you've got plenty of experience there. / ƒETCH COMMS / 02:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Guerillero, write something, anything and try to get it to GA or DYK - it's not hard. Really. Choose a subject. There are plenty of us who can give pointers. Writing content is what this place is all about, I personally resent the idea of non-content writers dictating rules for content-writers (note that I said idea - actually there are alot of non-content writers who do lots of useful stuff :))) ) Casliber ( talk · contribs) 11:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Guerillero ( talk · contribs · count) I am looking at doing a RfA sometime In the future and I would like to know if that is a viable idea. Guerillero | My Talk 20:35, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Questions
Reviews
First off: I'd support. You have clue, you manage to exist in a cesspool of drama (FS) without going insane or contributing to it, and you're a dedicated worker bee.
My suggestion is to give it a few more months. If your edit count drops too low in May/June/July then running in August will get you raised eyebrows and a bunch of opposes. If you can get 250+ edits for those months then running in August will work. I only urge this conservative strategy because 1) I don't want you to get slaughtered for no good reason, and 2) if you run now and don't get promoted, you won't be realisticly able to run until December.
I believe you are an asset to Wikipedia. Your work in the Campus/Online Ambassador program is excellent. You are a knowledgeable editor with a well-measured response. Your content is a bit low but that's really easy to make up for. Keep up the good work- I am proud of you! Basket of Puppies 02:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Guerillero, you're a bright, clueful user who's on the right track. If you want to pass RfA, I'd just address what Sven mentioned (edit summaries, a bit more sustained activity, etc.) and make sure you figure out what admin work you want to do—AIV, RfPP, XfD, CSD, RM, SPI, etc.—and make sure you've got plenty of experience there. / ƒETCH COMMS / 02:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Guerillero, write something, anything and try to get it to GA or DYK - it's not hard. Really. Choose a subject. There are plenty of us who can give pointers. Writing content is what this place is all about, I personally resent the idea of non-content writers dictating rules for content-writers (note that I said idea - actually there are alot of non-content writers who do lots of useful stuff :))) ) Casliber ( talk · contribs) 11:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)