What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
I would probably have to say that my primary contributions tend to be in areas of esoteric interest, such as international, scientific and medical topics. Because many of my contributions have been spread across a lot of different stubs, it is difficult to specifically define what I am most pleased with--but I would reason that
MON 863 is among the best examples in recent weeks.
Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I do not recall anything particularly sour ever being shared between another user and myself, but I have always done (and always will do) my best to resolve editorial disagreements through reasoned discussion.
Reviews
Hi. I only took a quick look at list of your last 500 edits. I see that you get involved in current events. On the list I noticed that you recently created
Taxation in Pakistan. I don't question that the information in it is true. However it gives the impression that it was written to advance a political cause. Are there other articles on "Taxation in Nation X"? I expected to see a category at the bottom for these.
Borock (
talk)
07:16, 5 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the reply. I hope my comments were helpful. There are a lot of editors who are here to push political agendas so it's important to write in a way that shows your neutrality. I think so anyway. Wishing you the best.
Borock (
talk)
16:36, 10 December 2010 (UTC)reply
What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
I would probably have to say that my primary contributions tend to be in areas of esoteric interest, such as international, scientific and medical topics. Because many of my contributions have been spread across a lot of different stubs, it is difficult to specifically define what I am most pleased with--but I would reason that
MON 863 is among the best examples in recent weeks.
Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I do not recall anything particularly sour ever being shared between another user and myself, but I have always done (and always will do) my best to resolve editorial disagreements through reasoned discussion.
Reviews
Hi. I only took a quick look at list of your last 500 edits. I see that you get involved in current events. On the list I noticed that you recently created
Taxation in Pakistan. I don't question that the information in it is true. However it gives the impression that it was written to advance a political cause. Are there other articles on "Taxation in Nation X"? I expected to see a category at the bottom for these.
Borock (
talk)
07:16, 5 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the reply. I hope my comments were helpful. There are a lot of editors who are here to push political agendas so it's important to write in a way that shows your neutrality. I think so anyway. Wishing you the best.
Borock (
talk)
16:36, 10 December 2010 (UTC)reply