From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

BrianY ( talk · contribs · count) After several years here, and as I have begun to pickup the pace of editing with more free time. Also looking for suggestions on how to improve. BrianY ( talk) 00:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Reviews

Right then. Your article edits are good, especially the USA representatives page, which I see is B-class which is great, especially with the number of esits you made to it (200+ I think!). It needs cleaning up, but I'll do that later. With regard to your conflicts, I think you did rather well there to stay calm and cmomposed, with good responses to the user. On to other edits, I see your article edits are very high (80% +) and I would advise you to get involved around in other areas like here, here and here, you will enjoy yourself! Overall, a really good editor, with great conribs and temprament. Happy editing. Overall Score: 9 out of 10. -- Athe Weatherman 18:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
    My primary contributions were at first, to the, Dodgers season articles. As many people started to get drawn into politics last year during the presidential race, I started working on political articles. My editing has started to pick up. I have been the main contributor to House of Representatives election page, while also contributing to various gubernatorial and senate races. One of my main focuses on these pages is to make sure all candidates who have announced are added on Wikipedia, and I make sure that these candidates are properly referenced.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    No users have caused me stress. I have been a rather low key editor. The edit disputes I got into were at the beginning of my first few months at wikipedia such as this, this, this which was mainly this: one editor didn't want stats involved on the baseball team articles and some editors including me did. We were able to talk it over. BrianY ( talk) 00:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

BrianY ( talk · contribs · count) After several years here, and as I have begun to pickup the pace of editing with more free time. Also looking for suggestions on how to improve. BrianY ( talk) 00:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Reviews

Right then. Your article edits are good, especially the USA representatives page, which I see is B-class which is great, especially with the number of esits you made to it (200+ I think!). It needs cleaning up, but I'll do that later. With regard to your conflicts, I think you did rather well there to stay calm and cmomposed, with good responses to the user. On to other edits, I see your article edits are very high (80% +) and I would advise you to get involved around in other areas like here, here and here, you will enjoy yourself! Overall, a really good editor, with great conribs and temprament. Happy editing. Overall Score: 9 out of 10. -- Athe Weatherman 18:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
    My primary contributions were at first, to the, Dodgers season articles. As many people started to get drawn into politics last year during the presidential race, I started working on political articles. My editing has started to pick up. I have been the main contributor to House of Representatives election page, while also contributing to various gubernatorial and senate races. One of my main focuses on these pages is to make sure all candidates who have announced are added on Wikipedia, and I make sure that these candidates are properly referenced.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    No users have caused me stress. I have been a rather low key editor. The edit disputes I got into were at the beginning of my first few months at wikipedia such as this, this, this which was mainly this: one editor didn't want stats involved on the baseball team articles and some editors including me did. We were able to talk it over. BrianY ( talk) 00:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook