Arnon Chaffin ( talk · contribs) Hi I wanted to get an editor review so I could see what I'm doing good and bad,please commet Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 21:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
- Hello. From your contributions, I can see that you are a good editor dedicated to helping spread the
WikiLove. I noticed you have have made more than 2000 edits. Most people would think this is a good think, seeing that you started editing only abount a month ago. However, I noticed that about 341 of your edits were to your own Userpages, 121 edits were to your own Talk page, and that 74 of your edits were to the sandbox. Also, I saw that many of your edits are Welcomes to new users (for example,
here). I'm not saying that these are bad things. You should definitively continue doing them. I'm only saying that you should start doing stuff like patrolling
Special:Newpages and participating in
AfD's and
RfA's, so you can meet other editors and gain their trust. You should also become involved in a
Wikiproject and become more active in fighting vandalism. I also urge you to remember to always use edit summaries and be careful when typing to avoid spelling mistakes like "commet" above. Other than these recommendations, please continue your excellent work here at Wikipedia. Happy editing! Yours truly,
Boricuaeddie
Spread
the love!
03:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- I mostly do RC partolling and revert vandalism often but last nite there wasn't that much vandalism going on so I though I should go welcome some user, I have about 450 edits in mainspace(but you saw it too I guess) but anyway I'll try to partoll new page too,Thank you Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 12:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- I admire your heart in wanting to contribute to and improve Wikipedia, and appreciate that you've opened yourself to constructive criticism. I think when you have more experience, Wikipedia can count on you as a great asset. I think your wikitext/design skills are already impressive. Just take more care with your spelling, and learn from both your experiences and from other editors here.
Derumi
21:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah my spelling is very sad,:) because my fingers always smash both and I just started my Computer Class(We have to try to type without looking at the keyboard) anyway thank you for your lovely message. Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 21:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Just a small comment - your signature uses larger-than-regular text, which is discouraged by
signature guidelines, as it causes the surrounding text to shift around and format funny. I recommend changing it. ♠
P
M
C♠
21:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- I wasn't talking about size in the edit box, it's not much larger than mine, which isn't so bad; I was referring to the fact that your signature is in size four font, which makes it larger than the surrounding text. This gives undue importance to your signature as well as forcing the text around it to shift. Signature guidelines discourage this. ♠ P M C♠ 00:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- I also came here to comment on your signature. Your signature is distracting, and offsets the text on talk pages. I noticed you area also creating large signatures for other editors, which also cause the same problems. Please reconsider this.
KillerChihuahua
?!?
20:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies, apparently this comment was out of date by the time I posted it. I am glad to see you've changed your sig, and I am sorry for missing that prior to posting here. KillerChihuahua ?!? 20:24, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- What was the point of this and this? MoodyGroove 00:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)MoodyGroove
- Why would I ask on your talk page when you specifically requested feedback in the form of an editor review? AKMask had already answered your question by saying that he understood WP:3RR then. He also admitted that he made a mistake. You had him at a disadvantage because he was sitting for an RFA (regardless of how you voted), and I thought your follow-up questions were harsh. By asking "Do you understand it now? Yes or no?" you ignored the fact that he claimed to have understood it then. By forcing a "yes or no" response, you put AKMask into the position of having to agree with a false premise, which struck me as rude. That's why I was giving you the opportunity to clarify what point you were making. An RFA isn't a trial, and candidates are allowed to qualify their answers. In fact, they should be encouraged to. MoodyGroove 14:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)MoodyGroove
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
- View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- Only Mostly Vandalism Reverting and minor edits in articles. Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 21:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- No, Not really beacuse I never edit Article that often. Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 21:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- I was wondering: what you were doing with these "editors", who are abusing Wikipedia as a social networking site? They have made more than 1000 edits combined yet the sum of their mainspace contributions is less than 10 and admit they have no intention to contribute to the encyclopedia. MER-C 09:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Additional Questions from
Dfrg.
msc:
Borrowed from Glen ( talk · contribs), I'm sure he wont mind. These should test you editing skills, and show if you have any weaknesses which you can work on. So, just write your answer next to the Question. Good luck.
Speedy Delete or not:
Vandalism or or not:
Have fun! Dfrg. msc 07:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Arnon Chaffin ( talk · contribs) Hi I wanted to get an editor review so I could see what I'm doing good and bad,please commet Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 21:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
- Hello. From your contributions, I can see that you are a good editor dedicated to helping spread the
WikiLove. I noticed you have have made more than 2000 edits. Most people would think this is a good think, seeing that you started editing only abount a month ago. However, I noticed that about 341 of your edits were to your own Userpages, 121 edits were to your own Talk page, and that 74 of your edits were to the sandbox. Also, I saw that many of your edits are Welcomes to new users (for example,
here). I'm not saying that these are bad things. You should definitively continue doing them. I'm only saying that you should start doing stuff like patrolling
Special:Newpages and participating in
AfD's and
RfA's, so you can meet other editors and gain their trust. You should also become involved in a
Wikiproject and become more active in fighting vandalism. I also urge you to remember to always use edit summaries and be careful when typing to avoid spelling mistakes like "commet" above. Other than these recommendations, please continue your excellent work here at Wikipedia. Happy editing! Yours truly,
Boricuaeddie
Spread
the love!
03:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- I mostly do RC partolling and revert vandalism often but last nite there wasn't that much vandalism going on so I though I should go welcome some user, I have about 450 edits in mainspace(but you saw it too I guess) but anyway I'll try to partoll new page too,Thank you Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 12:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- I admire your heart in wanting to contribute to and improve Wikipedia, and appreciate that you've opened yourself to constructive criticism. I think when you have more experience, Wikipedia can count on you as a great asset. I think your wikitext/design skills are already impressive. Just take more care with your spelling, and learn from both your experiences and from other editors here.
Derumi
21:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah my spelling is very sad,:) because my fingers always smash both and I just started my Computer Class(We have to try to type without looking at the keyboard) anyway thank you for your lovely message. Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 21:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Just a small comment - your signature uses larger-than-regular text, which is discouraged by
signature guidelines, as it causes the surrounding text to shift around and format funny. I recommend changing it. ♠
P
M
C♠
21:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- I wasn't talking about size in the edit box, it's not much larger than mine, which isn't so bad; I was referring to the fact that your signature is in size four font, which makes it larger than the surrounding text. This gives undue importance to your signature as well as forcing the text around it to shift. Signature guidelines discourage this. ♠ P M C♠ 00:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- I also came here to comment on your signature. Your signature is distracting, and offsets the text on talk pages. I noticed you area also creating large signatures for other editors, which also cause the same problems. Please reconsider this.
KillerChihuahua
?!?
20:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies, apparently this comment was out of date by the time I posted it. I am glad to see you've changed your sig, and I am sorry for missing that prior to posting here. KillerChihuahua ?!? 20:24, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- What was the point of this and this? MoodyGroove 00:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)MoodyGroove
- Why would I ask on your talk page when you specifically requested feedback in the form of an editor review? AKMask had already answered your question by saying that he understood WP:3RR then. He also admitted that he made a mistake. You had him at a disadvantage because he was sitting for an RFA (regardless of how you voted), and I thought your follow-up questions were harsh. By asking "Do you understand it now? Yes or no?" you ignored the fact that he claimed to have understood it then. By forcing a "yes or no" response, you put AKMask into the position of having to agree with a false premise, which struck me as rude. That's why I was giving you the opportunity to clarify what point you were making. An RFA isn't a trial, and candidates are allowed to qualify their answers. In fact, they should be encouraged to. MoodyGroove 14:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)MoodyGroove
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
- View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- Only Mostly Vandalism Reverting and minor edits in articles. Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 21:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- No, Not really beacuse I never edit Article that often. Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 21:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- I was wondering: what you were doing with these "editors", who are abusing Wikipedia as a social networking site? They have made more than 1000 edits combined yet the sum of their mainspace contributions is less than 10 and admit they have no intention to contribute to the encyclopedia. MER-C 09:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Additional Questions from
Dfrg.
msc:
Borrowed from Glen ( talk · contribs), I'm sure he wont mind. These should test you editing skills, and show if you have any weaknesses which you can work on. So, just write your answer next to the Question. Good luck.
Speedy Delete or not:
Vandalism or or not:
Have fun! Dfrg. msc 07:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)