M Lhuillier ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( restore)

Credible claim of significance that is beyond what an A7 is for, multiple in-depth articles about the company in reliable 3rd-party press. Examples are Manila Bulletin, BusinessWorld, Philstar, The Manila Times and SunStar. A copy of the article along with sources used is available at sandbox. Orasims ( talk) 05:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

• Note: Temporarily undeleted for DRV. Daniel ( talk) 06:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
• Overturn speedy there is enough WP:SIGCOV in the article to establish some level of notability and, at the very least, warrant a full AFD discussion. Frank Anchor 14:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
• Meh. overturn speedy, send to AfD. Likely doesn't meet WP:CORP. And honestly might not meet WP:N given the sources I'm seeing in the draft. But if WP:N is close, it probably shouldn't be speedied. Hobit ( talk) 19:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
• Weak Overturn A7 and send to AfD. The references cited include major newspapers that include The Philippine Star, ABS-CBN, The Philippine Star. I think the coverage appear to be routine and fails WP:CORPDEPTH, and an AfD discussion would very likely close in delete, but the references are still sufficient to satisfy part 2 of WP:CCOS. Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 23:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
• Overturn A7 and Send to AFD. The article does make a credible claim of significance that is short of notability. Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
• Overturn. A major remittance company with a couple thousand branches, partnered with Western Union and DHL, similar to this one: Cebuana Lhuillier — Alalch E. 08:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
• Overturn speedy. While the prose contains no explicit claims of significance, the sources present evidence of coverage in multiple independent reliable sources which is much more than enough to disqualify it from A7. Thryduulf ( talk) 01:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply