|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
|
I am the subject of the article. The previous discussion was closed only because the nomination for deletion was withdrawn. It looks as though consensus would have been to delete. I am sure the notability requirements are not met and deletion of the article is appropriate. It must not be that every independently recorded album is seen as “notable” for inclusion on Wikipedia, and thus used as a basis to prove significant notability of the artist. H etching ( talk) 18:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
|
This was not a "clear or obvious case", therefore a non-admin closure was unwarranted especially considering that the one closing the discussion is not so experienced in closures. Closing the discussion without stating the reason is self-evident that this is a challengeable closure. My point is short and straight-forward on why this article should be deleted: Passing WP:ANYBIO (although i don't believe it does) does not ensure notability (per itself) and in this case, where there is a serious problem with WP:V (the subject blatantly fails WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NACADEMICS and NO (not 1) independent reliable sources can be found as one can check) the article can not be kept with 3 out of the 4 votes being- 1) Author vote 2) Monteboat (a new editor with double digit edits) 3) Delete turned Weak Keep. At the very least, it should've been relisted. Also see this discussion. Edit: The closer has admitted to closing an afd as keep because "the keep votes were leading by one". This shows that he is not an adept at this. Pesticide1110 Lets wrestle! 06:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
|
I am the subject of the article. The previous discussion was closed only because the nomination for deletion was withdrawn. It looks as though consensus would have been to delete. I am sure the notability requirements are not met and deletion of the article is appropriate. It must not be that every independently recorded album is seen as “notable” for inclusion on Wikipedia, and thus used as a basis to prove significant notability of the artist. H etching ( talk) 18:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
|
This was not a "clear or obvious case", therefore a non-admin closure was unwarranted especially considering that the one closing the discussion is not so experienced in closures. Closing the discussion without stating the reason is self-evident that this is a challengeable closure. My point is short and straight-forward on why this article should be deleted: Passing WP:ANYBIO (although i don't believe it does) does not ensure notability (per itself) and in this case, where there is a serious problem with WP:V (the subject blatantly fails WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NACADEMICS and NO (not 1) independent reliable sources can be found as one can check) the article can not be kept with 3 out of the 4 votes being- 1) Author vote 2) Monteboat (a new editor with double digit edits) 3) Delete turned Weak Keep. At the very least, it should've been relisted. Also see this discussion. Edit: The closer has admitted to closing an afd as keep because "the keep votes were leading by one". This shows that he is not an adept at this. Pesticide1110 Lets wrestle! 06:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |