|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Disputed Speedy deletion. This article cannot be deleted as speedy, since it's subject it's notable and the article already survived 2 AFDs ( 1, 2). I can't say about the last page version, but at some point in history the page has had a decent look, and eventually it can be restored at that state. XXN,
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
The article has got deleted through CSD as WP:G4 though it was not similar to the previously deleted article. It had many new sources added, with significant coverage. I placed two undeletion requests at the deletion admin's talk page with no response. Maybe, they are busy, and therefore, i request a deletion review here. The person who nominated the page doesn't seem to have checked it properly or it doesn't qualify for G4 in any way. The last version was completely different from the one deleted in 2016. Tungut bey ( talk) 15:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Reason for deletion: (Expired BLPPROD, unsourced BLP) Here are two sources:
Not sure why this was unsourced. Please undelete it so it can be worked on. Philly jawn ( talk) 03:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Disputed Speedy deletion. This article cannot be deleted as speedy, since it's subject it's notable and the article already survived 2 AFDs ( 1, 2). I can't say about the last page version, but at some point in history the page has had a decent look, and eventually it can be restored at that state. XXN,
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
The article has got deleted through CSD as WP:G4 though it was not similar to the previously deleted article. It had many new sources added, with significant coverage. I placed two undeletion requests at the deletion admin's talk page with no response. Maybe, they are busy, and therefore, i request a deletion review here. The person who nominated the page doesn't seem to have checked it properly or it doesn't qualify for G4 in any way. The last version was completely different from the one deleted in 2016. Tungut bey ( talk) 15:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Reason for deletion: (Expired BLPPROD, unsourced BLP) Here are two sources:
Not sure why this was unsourced. Please undelete it so it can be worked on. Philly jawn ( talk) 03:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |