Hello everyone,I am disagree with deletion article Pavel Stankevych. Because I think he meets criteria.
He won a bronze medal on one of the biggest circus festival in Paris.Former artist of Cirque du Soleil.Now working in Las vegas with company Spiegelworld. He was an invited star on German Italian Spain Show Talent.Was invited to show Ellen Dedgeneres because of his viral video.
He was working in famous shows in Europe.
Behappy 29 (
talk) 19:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Endorse The discussion was properly closed though on the light side of participation, and I don't see anything that's changed between the closing of the AfD and now in terms of notability.
SportingFlyerT·C 20:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
He is equilibrist.He won a bronze medal on one of the famous circus festival.He meets criteria
WP:SPORTSPERSON.Artist of Cirque Du Soleil, mentioned on circus shows in Europe.He has a lot of views, a lot of videos about him on YouTube, has a good fan base.Sometimes people write his name incorrectly Pavel Stankevich.Just check on all languages.Or he meets
WP:ENTBehappy 29 (
talk) 15:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
We are not here to have a second AfD but rather to check if the original AfD was closed properly. If you think he's notable, you'll need to write a draft with reliable, independent, secondary sources showing notability.
SportingFlyerT·C 10:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Yes i think he is.Sources were added to the article that confirm my words.It does not make sense to make a same draft.
Behappy 29 (
talk) 15:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Endorse. Deletion review is a place to deal with the deletion process not being properly followed. It is not a place to disagree with deletion decisions for reasons that were already (or could/should have been) raised at the debate itself.
Stifle (
talk) 14:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
If i am not agree with deletion where should i write?Sources were added to the article that confirm my words.
Behappy 29 (
talk) 15:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Endorse - The close properly reflects the consensus of the community. The appellant was tiresome in the AFD and is being tiresome in this DRV. Making the same statement over and over again is not persuasive.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 15:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I say the same thing all the time because I i think he meets criteria
WP:SPORTSPERSONWP:ENT.And have a proof of this in the article
Behappy 29 (
talk) 20:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Endorse - nothing wrong the close.
Onel5969TT me 19:48, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is an archive of the
deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
Hello everyone,I am disagree with deletion article Pavel Stankevych. Because I think he meets criteria.
He won a bronze medal on one of the biggest circus festival in Paris.Former artist of Cirque du Soleil.Now working in Las vegas with company Spiegelworld. He was an invited star on German Italian Spain Show Talent.Was invited to show Ellen Dedgeneres because of his viral video.
He was working in famous shows in Europe.
Behappy 29 (
talk) 19:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Endorse The discussion was properly closed though on the light side of participation, and I don't see anything that's changed between the closing of the AfD and now in terms of notability.
SportingFlyerT·C 20:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
He is equilibrist.He won a bronze medal on one of the famous circus festival.He meets criteria
WP:SPORTSPERSON.Artist of Cirque Du Soleil, mentioned on circus shows in Europe.He has a lot of views, a lot of videos about him on YouTube, has a good fan base.Sometimes people write his name incorrectly Pavel Stankevich.Just check on all languages.Or he meets
WP:ENTBehappy 29 (
talk) 15:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
We are not here to have a second AfD but rather to check if the original AfD was closed properly. If you think he's notable, you'll need to write a draft with reliable, independent, secondary sources showing notability.
SportingFlyerT·C 10:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Yes i think he is.Sources were added to the article that confirm my words.It does not make sense to make a same draft.
Behappy 29 (
talk) 15:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Endorse. Deletion review is a place to deal with the deletion process not being properly followed. It is not a place to disagree with deletion decisions for reasons that were already (or could/should have been) raised at the debate itself.
Stifle (
talk) 14:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
If i am not agree with deletion where should i write?Sources were added to the article that confirm my words.
Behappy 29 (
talk) 15:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Endorse - The close properly reflects the consensus of the community. The appellant was tiresome in the AFD and is being tiresome in this DRV. Making the same statement over and over again is not persuasive.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 15:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I say the same thing all the time because I i think he meets criteria
WP:SPORTSPERSONWP:ENT.And have a proof of this in the article
Behappy 29 (
talk) 20:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Endorse - nothing wrong the close.
Onel5969TT me 19:48, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is an archive of the
deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.