Anybody is then free to re-nominate them individually, or do whatever they would normally do under the auspices of WP:BRD. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:48, 31 October 2019 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Insufficient discussion for multiple pages which should have resulted in "No Consensus" Jax 0677 ( talk) 20:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
/* Song Like You */
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I was very surprised to see this article closed as a keep. This started out as a garden variety WP:NOTNEWS, and while sources were added to the article, I think the closer incorrectly ignored the delete !voters who commentated after the addition. The WP:GNG/ WP:EVENTCRIT analysis by the closer comes off as a bit of a supervote considering nobody discussed WP:EVENTCRIT. I myself did not follow the AfD closely and did not realise it had been improved until I checked the close, but I would have reiterated my delete !vote. I'm asking that this either be relisted or re-closed as a no consensus, so it can be easily renominated in the future. (Also entirely ignored at the AfD were possible issues with WP:CRIME.) SportingFlyer T· C 10:41, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I was never notified of the speedy deletion of this article, first created in 2010, until after it already occurred, and I dispute the characterization of "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". Note that Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G11._Unambiguous_advertising_or_promotion states: "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion." I reviewed the deleted article and do not see how the text is promotional. Please refer to the talk page User_talk:WhisperToMe#Islamic_Education_Institute_of_Texas. @ Jimfbleak:@ Liz: BTW, some background: This is the Islamic school controlled by the Islamic Society of Greater Houston - I wrote an article about the organization too, and the organization itself is dicussed in multiple reliable sources, mainly from newspapers. WhisperToMe ( talk) 02:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
Anybody is then free to re-nominate them individually, or do whatever they would normally do under the auspices of WP:BRD. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:48, 31 October 2019 (UTC) |
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Insufficient discussion for multiple pages which should have resulted in "No Consensus" Jax 0677 ( talk) 20:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
/* Song Like You */
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I was very surprised to see this article closed as a keep. This started out as a garden variety WP:NOTNEWS, and while sources were added to the article, I think the closer incorrectly ignored the delete !voters who commentated after the addition. The WP:GNG/ WP:EVENTCRIT analysis by the closer comes off as a bit of a supervote considering nobody discussed WP:EVENTCRIT. I myself did not follow the AfD closely and did not realise it had been improved until I checked the close, but I would have reiterated my delete !vote. I'm asking that this either be relisted or re-closed as a no consensus, so it can be easily renominated in the future. (Also entirely ignored at the AfD were possible issues with WP:CRIME.) SportingFlyer T· C 10:41, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I was never notified of the speedy deletion of this article, first created in 2010, until after it already occurred, and I dispute the characterization of "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". Note that Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G11._Unambiguous_advertising_or_promotion states: "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion." I reviewed the deleted article and do not see how the text is promotional. Please refer to the talk page User_talk:WhisperToMe#Islamic_Education_Institute_of_Texas. @ Jimfbleak:@ Liz: BTW, some background: This is the Islamic school controlled by the Islamic Society of Greater Houston - I wrote an article about the organization too, and the organization itself is dicussed in multiple reliable sources, mainly from newspapers. WhisperToMe ( talk) 02:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |