The great subscriber war ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( restore)

^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]}

• I originally closed this as disruptive, and blocked the nom. I've since become aware that they have an extensive history on other projects, so I've come to the conclusion that my reaction may have been excessive. AINH stated on their talk page that the reason they want this restored is because they, want to create the exact same article on zhwiki and I prefer to start a page by translating it rather than start from scratch. I don't know what policies are in place on zhwiki, but on en, the desire to translate an article to another project is not a valid reason to restore it here, so this nomination fails WP:DRVPURPOSE. In any case, the deleted article is such a shambles, if WP:A7 didn't apply, then any of WP:A1, WP:G1, or possibly WP:G11 might have. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:49, 2 January 2019 (UTC) reply
• Well the only content of the deleted page was the infobox from World War I, where the creator changed a few fields to have stuff about the subject matter, breaking the formatting in the process. I can't see how that could possibly be useful in encyclopedia article and it's certainly close to the intersection of several speedy deletion criteria. Somebody else has written PewDiePie vs T-Series about the same subject, and that page does have actual prose, references and the other things we expect from an encyclopedia article, so I suggest the OP just contribute to that one (or translate it). Hut 8.5 18:37, 2 January 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Got it. Thanks- AINH ( talk) 04:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC) reply
• Endorse per the above comments on content being non-existent, of the sources I can read no one describes it as "the great subscriber war" etc. Maybe this as an event has some notability, but likely within the articles on the individuals as a footnote as present and certainly not under an exaggerated title. -- 81.108.53.238 ( talk) 22:39, 3 January 2019 (UTC) reply