The Lafayette Club ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( XfD| restore)

No consensus, default to endorse. A consensus was not reached on whether the page should be deleted based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lafayette Club. The club also recently received coverage from the Maltese press, see: PM holds dialogue with Scottish university students on future of EU, and based on the future speakers, it is likely that it will receive more. If it would not be possible to restore the page, I would be grateful if you moved the deleted page to my sandbox so that it can be improved. Kioj156 ( talk) 15:49, 24 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Endorse while the votes were 3-3, the administrator's actions are justified in not finding a consensus as the keep votes didn't address notability concerns, plus AfDs are not a vote. SportingFlyer ( talk) 20:00, 24 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Endorse numerically this was a no consensus but the Delete arguments were much stronger than the Keep arguments, which did not address the notability concerns. Instead they focused on the importance of the speakers and the fact that we have articles on some other student organisations, neither of which is particularly relevant. The closing admin is expected to downweight comments which use weaker arguments, see WP:DGFA. Incidentally the OP's link doesn't work. Hut 8.5 11:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Comment apologies, https://www.tvm.com.mt/en/news/pm-holds-dialogue-scottish-university-students-future-eu/ Kioj156 ( talk) 13:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• I don't think that link would have affected the outcome of the AfD. The club only gets once sentence of actual coverage in there, and something more substantial is required to pass the general notability guideline. Hut 8.5 18:45, 25 February 2018 (UTC) reply