File:National Bank of New Zealand logo.svg ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( article| XfD| restore)

Lack of consensus; no discussion since 15 June 2016. There is no rationale for treating the National Bank of New Zealand differently to Lloyds Bank Canada, Lloyds Bank California and Lloyds Associated Banking Company. All four entities used the undifferenced black horse device. 2.27.81.170 ( talk) 17:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Comment: There is discussion relevant to this at User talk:Nthep#IP 2.28.71.127. Also, since IP 2.27.81.170 (the IP who started this review), IP 2.28.71.127 (the IP who posted on the closing admin's user talk) and IP 2.27.75.26 (the IP who participated in the FFD discussion whose close is being reviewed) are quite possibly the same person. If that's the case then it might be helpful for everyone who participates in this DRV if that's made clear, just to avoid any misunderstanding or confusion. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC) reply
• Endorse The dialectical reasoning at this WP:FFD discussion would not have disgraced the Council of Trent. Lack of sensible rationale has never been a disadvantage on these occasions. Thincat ( talk) 10:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC) reply
• Endorse. Properly closed. See advice at Wikipedia:Renominating for deletion. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 11:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC) reply
• Endorse weakly, consensus seems clear. Renomination is possible. Stifle ( talk) 12:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. Not sure how the "consensus seems clear". There were two editors discussing: one for deletion and one (myself) against. 2.27.92.11 ( talk) 19:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Yes, it is indeed a very curious comment to make about the discussion. Clarity and consensus both seem to be outstandingly lacking. Thincat ( talk) 10:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Presidential and Vice Presidential March ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( XfD| restore)

Prematurely closed, I would have commented keep because it is used in sources such as [1], which is why I created the redirect. - CHAMPION ^{( talk) ( contributions) ( logs)} 00:27, 26 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Confused, the discussion was closed as "nomination withdrawn" and the page was kept, so I'm not sure what you're asking for here. Lankiveil ^{( speak to me)} 01:27, 26 January 2017 (UTC). reply
  • @ Lankiveil: No, it wasn't kept as is, note that it was closed as retarget. - CHAMPION ^{( talk) ( contributions) ( logs)} 01:42, 26 January 2017 (UTC) reply