|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
This page was originally a paragraph in an article being constructed in Sandbox about the activist and musician, Derek Williams. It was migrated in an attempt to reduce the size of the Williams article, despite adding to his notability. However, the article was nominated for speedy deletion on the grounds that it was not a notable campaign. After that, there was one vote to Keep, one to Merge to Sibelius (software) and another to Merge to Sibelius Software, so it’s hard to see this as ‘consensus’ to Merge to Sibelius Software (different page to Sibelius (software)). Summary of the 4 votes:
No option received more than one vote, so the current consensus is 3/1 not to erase the content. Another option is to reintegrate the content back to the Derek Williams article, and see what fate that suffers. If the entire Williams article ends up being deleted along similar lines, then mention could still be made of the Save Sibelius campaign under the articles: orphaned technology, abandonware, planned obsolescence, asset stripping Chrisdevelop ( talk) 01:00, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
@ Cryptic:@ Power~enwiki:@ Hut 8.5:@ RoySmith:@ K.e.coffman:@ Unscintillating:@ Mangoe:@ Raymond3023:@ MBisanz:@ Sandstein:@ Rusf10:@ ElonTesla: A proposal to Merge and Rename has been placed in both Sibelius Software and Sibelius (software) articles. Please consider Endorsing the most recent merger proposal. Chrisdevelop ( talk)
I'm on vacation and don't plan to comment on this until about 0000GMT on January 5 (if it is still open). I hope you can resolve this without me. I considered this a fairly standard AfD nomination from the NPP queue and have no further comment about any of the merits. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I actually have no opinion if the subject is notable or not, consider this Deletion review as procedural and a test for consensus. The article was deleted after a deletion discussion, which concluded that: 1. it was unclear if she met WP:ENT, and 2. she appeared to lack coverage in reliable sources. This discussion is to discuss if either of those still apply. She appears to have had two main roles: as Megumi Amatsuka in GJ Club and as Rumia Tingel in Akashic Records of Bastard Magic Instructor. It appears she was also the dub actress for Lilo in the Japanese dub of Lilo & Stitch. Question: are those three main roles (one anime and one dub) enough for her to pass WP:ENT? In addition, I looked around for Japanese sources, and I found some, such as this interview together with the other cast members of Akashic Records, and others like this link and this link; however, it seems that most sources I could find are about her roles as Rumia. Is the coverage available good enough for article recreation to be permitted, or is Miyamoto still a case of WP:TOOSOON? A discussion with the deleting admin was inconclusive, so DRV it is. Note that the AfD nominator was since topic banned from deletion discussions as a result of two ANI discussions. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 13:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
This page was deleted despite numerous sources showing it is notable. The closing admin ignored the sources listed in the Afd in their closing of the discussion, as well as the thread of discussion, especially in the comments, which looked to me like the keeps came out on top. It was argued without much rebuttal that the list would be easy to maintain. There were issues with delete arguments brought up that were not addressed. He/she also ignored the argument by some that the list could be shortened. (Indeed, the admin did not close with an explanation) List of Most-followed Instagram accounts is one of the most popular pages on Wikipedia. There are sources that show the list is notable as it was: [1] [2] Subuey ( talk) 21:04, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
This page was originally a paragraph in an article being constructed in Sandbox about the activist and musician, Derek Williams. It was migrated in an attempt to reduce the size of the Williams article, despite adding to his notability. However, the article was nominated for speedy deletion on the grounds that it was not a notable campaign. After that, there was one vote to Keep, one to Merge to Sibelius (software) and another to Merge to Sibelius Software, so it’s hard to see this as ‘consensus’ to Merge to Sibelius Software (different page to Sibelius (software)). Summary of the 4 votes:
No option received more than one vote, so the current consensus is 3/1 not to erase the content. Another option is to reintegrate the content back to the Derek Williams article, and see what fate that suffers. If the entire Williams article ends up being deleted along similar lines, then mention could still be made of the Save Sibelius campaign under the articles: orphaned technology, abandonware, planned obsolescence, asset stripping Chrisdevelop ( talk) 01:00, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
@ Cryptic:@ Power~enwiki:@ Hut 8.5:@ RoySmith:@ K.e.coffman:@ Unscintillating:@ Mangoe:@ Raymond3023:@ MBisanz:@ Sandstein:@ Rusf10:@ ElonTesla: A proposal to Merge and Rename has been placed in both Sibelius Software and Sibelius (software) articles. Please consider Endorsing the most recent merger proposal. Chrisdevelop ( talk)
I'm on vacation and don't plan to comment on this until about 0000GMT on January 5 (if it is still open). I hope you can resolve this without me. I considered this a fairly standard AfD nomination from the NPP queue and have no further comment about any of the merits. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I actually have no opinion if the subject is notable or not, consider this Deletion review as procedural and a test for consensus. The article was deleted after a deletion discussion, which concluded that: 1. it was unclear if she met WP:ENT, and 2. she appeared to lack coverage in reliable sources. This discussion is to discuss if either of those still apply. She appears to have had two main roles: as Megumi Amatsuka in GJ Club and as Rumia Tingel in Akashic Records of Bastard Magic Instructor. It appears she was also the dub actress for Lilo in the Japanese dub of Lilo & Stitch. Question: are those three main roles (one anime and one dub) enough for her to pass WP:ENT? In addition, I looked around for Japanese sources, and I found some, such as this interview together with the other cast members of Akashic Records, and others like this link and this link; however, it seems that most sources I could find are about her roles as Rumia. Is the coverage available good enough for article recreation to be permitted, or is Miyamoto still a case of WP:TOOSOON? A discussion with the deleting admin was inconclusive, so DRV it is. Note that the AfD nominator was since topic banned from deletion discussions as a result of two ANI discussions. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 13:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
This page was deleted despite numerous sources showing it is notable. The closing admin ignored the sources listed in the Afd in their closing of the discussion, as well as the thread of discussion, especially in the comments, which looked to me like the keeps came out on top. It was argued without much rebuttal that the list would be easy to maintain. There were issues with delete arguments brought up that were not addressed. He/she also ignored the argument by some that the list could be shortened. (Indeed, the admin did not close with an explanation) List of Most-followed Instagram accounts is one of the most popular pages on Wikipedia. There are sources that show the list is notable as it was: [1] [2] Subuey ( talk) 21:04, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |