|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Overturn The creator of the page was not informed of as to its nomination for deletion and further more evidence can be and is being provided as per the subject's notability Masterknighted ( talk) 14:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Related notability updates not in original article 1. Coverage of his work at McNeil Gallery on ArtNet [2] and again 2004 on artnet in 2004 [3] 2. Internationally exhibited - Italy [4] 3, Museum exhibition at the Bergen Museum of Art & Science (before the museum went online only during renovation) [5] 4. Notice of exhibition at Brooklyn Bridge Park on NYC Parks website [6] 5. Coverage of the artist in the Bushwick Daily [7] I should at least get a chance to make my case Masterknighted ( talk) 16:09, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment There are 2 museum exhibitiins
Comment Artnet has a magazne in which these articles appeared which in fact was the first major online art magazine and set tbe standard in the genre the website is not exactly in the same form as it was at the time these articles were published Masterknighted ( talk) 02:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
There is enough stuff of which wiki articles are made here to establish notability he is a well exhibited artist who is written about... This editor was blind-sighted. This is not the way to operate. A case cannot be heard in court without even a public defender that is no contest but the accused or litigated against would at least be informed of the charges, this is not the rule of law Masterknighted ( talk) 20:21, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment - that argument more actually reflects the initial non disclosure which is indeed made up for by having this vital discussion here , but, that said the previous argument just reinforces my argument here... The trial reference might be better stated as any contested issue it is just a matter of of jurisprudence for any proceeding. Masterknighted ( talk) 09:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment - it is the rule by which any forum operates in the sense of fair discourse Masterknighted ( talk) 10:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment - How can you improve an article which is currently deleted? Masterknighted ( talk) 02:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Overturn The creator of the page was not informed of as to its nomination for deletion and further more evidence can be and is being provided as per the subject's notability Masterknighted ( talk) 14:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Related notability updates not in original article 1. Coverage of his work at McNeil Gallery on ArtNet [2] and again 2004 on artnet in 2004 [3] 2. Internationally exhibited - Italy [4] 3, Museum exhibition at the Bergen Museum of Art & Science (before the museum went online only during renovation) [5] 4. Notice of exhibition at Brooklyn Bridge Park on NYC Parks website [6] 5. Coverage of the artist in the Bushwick Daily [7] I should at least get a chance to make my case Masterknighted ( talk) 16:09, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment There are 2 museum exhibitiins
Comment Artnet has a magazne in which these articles appeared which in fact was the first major online art magazine and set tbe standard in the genre the website is not exactly in the same form as it was at the time these articles were published Masterknighted ( talk) 02:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
There is enough stuff of which wiki articles are made here to establish notability he is a well exhibited artist who is written about... This editor was blind-sighted. This is not the way to operate. A case cannot be heard in court without even a public defender that is no contest but the accused or litigated against would at least be informed of the charges, this is not the rule of law Masterknighted ( talk) 20:21, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment - that argument more actually reflects the initial non disclosure which is indeed made up for by having this vital discussion here , but, that said the previous argument just reinforces my argument here... The trial reference might be better stated as any contested issue it is just a matter of of jurisprudence for any proceeding. Masterknighted ( talk) 09:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment - it is the rule by which any forum operates in the sense of fair discourse Masterknighted ( talk) 10:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment - How can you improve an article which is currently deleted? Masterknighted ( talk) 02:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |