From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

29 April 2016

  • Colégio Anglo Drummond – Noting that the discussion was closed by a non-administrator, I, an administrator, acting in line with WP:DPR#NAC, am vacating the close and relisting the discussion. – Stifle ( talk) 13:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Colégio Anglo Drummond ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( XfD| restore)

This AfD was closed as "speedy keep", but doesn't appear to meet the requirements for that outcome at Wikipedia:Speedy keep. Moreover, the closing summary states "secondary schools are always kept as notable", but this is not true. See, for example, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Shepherd English School, endorsed by Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 March 30#Good Shepherd English School. I am therefore challenging this close on procedural grounds. The discussion should have been allowed to run its course, and the close based on assessment of consensus at the end of that period of discussion. Cordless Larry ( talk) 07:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Overturn and reopen No, it shouldn't have been a speedy keep but snow keep might have been intended (and even our most distinguished administrators sometimes get confused). However, there was no good purpose in closing it a bit early, particularly when you said you might comment later. Although I am personally glad that high schools articles are generally kept and we are spared wasteful discussion, this is not a formal guideline and objections should be heard if people really insist. It wasn't at all a good close and the rationale was very poor indeed. So, I reluctantly think the AFD ought to be continued even though this prolongs the waste of time. Thincat ( talk) 11:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

29 April 2016

  • Colégio Anglo Drummond – Noting that the discussion was closed by a non-administrator, I, an administrator, acting in line with WP:DPR#NAC, am vacating the close and relisting the discussion. – Stifle ( talk) 13:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Colégio Anglo Drummond ( talk| | history| logs| links| watch) ( XfD| restore)

This AfD was closed as "speedy keep", but doesn't appear to meet the requirements for that outcome at Wikipedia:Speedy keep. Moreover, the closing summary states "secondary schools are always kept as notable", but this is not true. See, for example, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Shepherd English School, endorsed by Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 March 30#Good Shepherd English School. I am therefore challenging this close on procedural grounds. The discussion should have been allowed to run its course, and the close based on assessment of consensus at the end of that period of discussion. Cordless Larry ( talk) 07:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Overturn and reopen No, it shouldn't have been a speedy keep but snow keep might have been intended (and even our most distinguished administrators sometimes get confused). However, there was no good purpose in closing it a bit early, particularly when you said you might comment later. Although I am personally glad that high schools articles are generally kept and we are spared wasteful discussion, this is not a formal guideline and objections should be heard if people really insist. It wasn't at all a good close and the rationale was very poor indeed. So, I reluctantly think the AFD ought to be continued even though this prolongs the waste of time. Thincat ( talk) 11:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook