|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
This article was deleted based on only 5 votes, which basically stated that the company (HappyFunCorp) is not notable enough to deserve a page. Based on the Wikipedia guidelines, I believe HFC is more than deserving of a page, and they have received even more reliable 3rd party press since the page's deletion. I ask that the page be restored, new sources added and the language be reviewed to ensure it is not PR or publicity. Cheers! Also, please note I'm writing this for deletion review because the admin ( User:Randykitty) who deleted this page says he won't be active on Wikipedia for a while. HappyFunCorp Imarapaholic ( talk) 18:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you ( User:RoySmith) and ( User:Stifle). HappyFunCorp is mentioned in numerous publications, including Forbes, Inc., TechCrunch, FastCompany and BK Mag. Here are a few links to sources: http://techcrunch.com/2015/01/12/built-in-brooklyn-happyfuncorp/ - http://www.bkmag.com/2014/07/15/a-technology-academy-grows-in-brooklyn/ - http://www.fastcompany.com/3045128/passion-to-profit/this-web-development-shops-passion-project-injecting-your-company-culture- - http://www.forbes.com/sites/shanerobinson/2012/11/01/who-should-you-hire-to-build-your-web-startup-tips-for-non-technical-tech-entrepreneurs/.
Thank you ( User:RoySmith for looking through the sources. Alas, if you have written off TechCrunch (a major news source for Tech SMBs) as a good source, then I'd have to agree with your notion that HappyFunCorp has not received enough coverage to warrant a page. As to the standards of WP:N to which you alluded to, I have read through the notability guidelines several times (see my user talk) and found nothing detailing such a "standard." HFC has more than 15 pieces of reliable third-party press - I have seen many pages with weaker sources and much more bias which have not been flagged. This company is notable, plus cool!, and as soon as they receive more press I will reach out again. Thank you very much for your help. |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
(see below) Esquivalience t 20:08, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
It was not duplicate article. It was subtopic (airstrikes) in a broader topic (intervention). It was created on 30 September, not as fork. Deleted by Materialscientist without correct discussion (only 1 hour after it was started on night), without merging etc. Please restore and send back to AfD for giving of arguments by another users. 178.94.165.139 ( talk) 16:29, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
This article was deleted based on only 5 votes, which basically stated that the company (HappyFunCorp) is not notable enough to deserve a page. Based on the Wikipedia guidelines, I believe HFC is more than deserving of a page, and they have received even more reliable 3rd party press since the page's deletion. I ask that the page be restored, new sources added and the language be reviewed to ensure it is not PR or publicity. Cheers! Also, please note I'm writing this for deletion review because the admin ( User:Randykitty) who deleted this page says he won't be active on Wikipedia for a while. HappyFunCorp Imarapaholic ( talk) 18:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you ( User:RoySmith) and ( User:Stifle). HappyFunCorp is mentioned in numerous publications, including Forbes, Inc., TechCrunch, FastCompany and BK Mag. Here are a few links to sources: http://techcrunch.com/2015/01/12/built-in-brooklyn-happyfuncorp/ - http://www.bkmag.com/2014/07/15/a-technology-academy-grows-in-brooklyn/ - http://www.fastcompany.com/3045128/passion-to-profit/this-web-development-shops-passion-project-injecting-your-company-culture- - http://www.forbes.com/sites/shanerobinson/2012/11/01/who-should-you-hire-to-build-your-web-startup-tips-for-non-technical-tech-entrepreneurs/.
Thank you ( User:RoySmith for looking through the sources. Alas, if you have written off TechCrunch (a major news source for Tech SMBs) as a good source, then I'd have to agree with your notion that HappyFunCorp has not received enough coverage to warrant a page. As to the standards of WP:N to which you alluded to, I have read through the notability guidelines several times (see my user talk) and found nothing detailing such a "standard." HFC has more than 15 pieces of reliable third-party press - I have seen many pages with weaker sources and much more bias which have not been flagged. This company is notable, plus cool!, and as soon as they receive more press I will reach out again. Thank you very much for your help. |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
(see below) Esquivalience t 20:08, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
It was not duplicate article. It was subtopic (airstrikes) in a broader topic (intervention). It was created on 30 September, not as fork. Deleted by Materialscientist without correct discussion (only 1 hour after it was started on night), without merging etc. Please restore and send back to AfD for giving of arguments by another users. 178.94.165.139 ( talk) 16:29, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |