|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Bots removing my own category and delete my page!!! 333 -blue 01:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Bots removing my own category and delete my page!!! 333 -blue 01:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC) User:333-blue/sandbox/2014 Sleeping Tour Bots removing my own category and delete my page!!! 333 -blue 01:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
| ||
---|---|---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. | ||
Article history:
Even though new information has surfaced, I am taking listing this at DRV because of the article's contentious history. Here are sources about the subject:
Robert Young has been frequently quoted as an expert in The New York Times ( link), the Los Angeles Times ( link), and The Washington Post ( link). Cunard ( talk) 01:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
| ||
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
This felt more like a super-vote from the closer rather than the review of the consensus. As I stated here, the closer's statement that "Active user working in longevity-related topics" seems like more a comment, not a review of what was discussed. Again, no one questioned whether the user was active (although he hadn't edited an article and months and was mostly just working on his user page) or argued inactivity as a rationale. The keeps votes from User:SiameseTurtle, and User:Longevitydude each argue that the user had a right to whatever he wants on his page (which is true, but subject to limitations), and that making personal attacks against the nominator. Longevitydude even removed the MFD tag. In contrast, the delete votes at the very least acknowledge discuss the webhost problems, and the BLP concerns which have been entirely ignored (namely posting birthdates for relatively unknown people). I don't think the proper close would be, rather than removing the possible BLP violations, to just telling the editor about it. And it's not just blue-links that need sources so I don't think the instruction was correct either. Similar userpages where this basically preferred version of lists were deleted. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. When the edit blanks the tables and is directed to work on the actual encyclopedia (the moderate position discussed there), we keep the rest and move on. When the editor agrees to move the content to projectspace, we accept it and move on. The general consensus from the discussion follows the consensus across MFD on this topic: editors should not be keeping their preferred formatting or order of tables on their userpages as basically decorations and instead should be directed to the projects to help out there. Ricky81682 ( talk) 00:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Bots removing my own category and delete my page!!! 333 -blue 01:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Bots removing my own category and delete my page!!! 333 -blue 01:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC) User:333-blue/sandbox/2014 Sleeping Tour Bots removing my own category and delete my page!!! 333 -blue 01:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
| ||
---|---|---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. | ||
Article history:
Even though new information has surfaced, I am taking listing this at DRV because of the article's contentious history. Here are sources about the subject:
Robert Young has been frequently quoted as an expert in The New York Times ( link), the Los Angeles Times ( link), and The Washington Post ( link). Cunard ( talk) 01:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
| ||
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
This felt more like a super-vote from the closer rather than the review of the consensus. As I stated here, the closer's statement that "Active user working in longevity-related topics" seems like more a comment, not a review of what was discussed. Again, no one questioned whether the user was active (although he hadn't edited an article and months and was mostly just working on his user page) or argued inactivity as a rationale. The keeps votes from User:SiameseTurtle, and User:Longevitydude each argue that the user had a right to whatever he wants on his page (which is true, but subject to limitations), and that making personal attacks against the nominator. Longevitydude even removed the MFD tag. In contrast, the delete votes at the very least acknowledge discuss the webhost problems, and the BLP concerns which have been entirely ignored (namely posting birthdates for relatively unknown people). I don't think the proper close would be, rather than removing the possible BLP violations, to just telling the editor about it. And it's not just blue-links that need sources so I don't think the instruction was correct either. Similar userpages where this basically preferred version of lists were deleted. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. When the edit blanks the tables and is directed to work on the actual encyclopedia (the moderate position discussed there), we keep the rest and move on. When the editor agrees to move the content to projectspace, we accept it and move on. The general consensus from the discussion follows the consensus across MFD on this topic: editors should not be keeping their preferred formatting or order of tables on their userpages as basically decorations and instead should be directed to the projects to help out there. Ricky81682 ( talk) 00:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |