|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Played today for Bayer 04 Leverkusen in the Bundesliga, so he is now notable ( WP:NFOOTBALL) [1]. Neojesus ( talk) 16:31, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
closing admin says GNG is met. But consensus in murder AfDs is that WP:EVENT should be met. Out of the 3 keep !voters only one produced a decent argument and the other 2 were weak. The overwhelming consensus is for delete. LibStar ( talk) 13:35, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
There was not consensus GNG was met. GNG excludes WP:ROUTINE coverage. If the majority of !voters thought GNG was met then most would !Vote keep. Again you are applying your own super vote, you think GNG is met, therefore the delete consensus doesn't outweigh the keep arguments, noting 2 of the 3 keep !voters presented weak arguments. LibStar ( talk) 16:20, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Played today for Bayer 04 Leverkusen in the Bundesliga, so he is now notable ( WP:NFOOTBALL) [1]. Neojesus ( talk) 16:31, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
closing admin says GNG is met. But consensus in murder AfDs is that WP:EVENT should be met. Out of the 3 keep !voters only one produced a decent argument and the other 2 were weak. The overwhelming consensus is for delete. LibStar ( talk) 13:35, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
There was not consensus GNG was met. GNG excludes WP:ROUTINE coverage. If the majority of !voters thought GNG was met then most would !Vote keep. Again you are applying your own super vote, you think GNG is met, therefore the delete consensus doesn't outweigh the keep arguments, noting 2 of the 3 keep !voters presented weak arguments. LibStar ( talk) 16:20, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |